Federated learning-based natural language processing: a systematic literature review

Abstract Federated learning (FL) is a decentralized machine learning (ML) framework that allows models to be trained without sharing the participants’ local data. FL thus preserves privacy better than centralized machine learning. Since textual data (such as clinical records, posts in social networks, or search queries) often contain personal information, many natural language processing (NLP) tasks dealing with such data have shifted from the centralized to the FL setting. However, FL is not free from issues, including convergence and security vulnerabilities (due to unreliable or poisoned data introduced into the model), communication and computation bottlenecks, and even privacy attacks orchestrated by honest-but-curious servers. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) of NLP applications in FL with a special focus on FL issues and the solutions proposed so far. Our review surveys 36 recent papers published in relevant venues, which are systematically analyzed and compared from multiple perspectives. As a result of the survey, we also identify the most outstanding challenges in the area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10970-5
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Federated learning-based natural language processing: a systematic literature review

Younas Khan, Josep Domingo‐Ferrer, David Sánchez
15 citations
Artificial Intelligence Review
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
5.21
article

Federated learning-based natural language processing: a systematic literature review

Younas Khan, Josep Domingo‐Ferrer, David Sánchez
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Abstract Federated learning (FL) is a decentralized machine learning (ML) framework that allows models to be trained without sharing the participants’ local data. FL thus preserves privacy better than centralized machine learning. Since textual data (such as clinical records, posts in social networks, or search queries) often contain personal information, many natural language processing (NLP) tasks dealing with such data have shifted from the centralized to the FL setting. However, FL is not free from issues, including convergence and security vulnerabilities (due to unreliable or poisoned data introduced into the model), communication and computation bottlenecks, and even privacy attacks orchestrated by honest-but-curious servers. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) of NLP applications in FL with a special focus on FL issues and the solutions proposed so far. Our review surveys 36 recent papers published in relevant venues, which are systematically analyzed and compared from multiple perspectives. As a result of the survey, we also identify the most outstanding challenges in the area.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 57(12)
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
European Commission, Generalitat de Catalunya, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Instituto Nacional de Ciberseguridad, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Research Executive Agency, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
5.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.