New US DHHS Guidelines for Feeding of HIV Exposed Infants: Uptake, Practice Variability and Concerns

Abstract Background Approximately 5000 infants are born to mothers living with HIV annually in the US. In the past, the Center for Disease Control (CDC), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) have recommended that people living with HIV (PWH) not breast/chest feed their infants. Recent changes published in January 2023 in the “Section on Infant Feeding for Individuals Living with HIV” in the US DHHS HIV Guidelines, now include that individuals with HIV who are on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with a sustained undetectable viral load (VL) and who choose to breastfeed should be supported in this decision. We evaluated the uptake of these guidelines, and practice variability across providers who care for such mothers and infants. Methods We surveyed Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society members who practice clinically in the US, via an internal email list serve. The ten-question survey assessed uptake of the updated DHHS guidelines and respondents’ clinical practice in three key areas that are subject to interpretation in the guidelines: VL control, mixed feeding, and ART prophylaxis. We used descriptive statistics to examine guideline uptake and variability in practice. We used inductive qualitative thematic analysis to identify themes in open-ended survey responses. Results Of 915 individuals who opened the survey, 165 responded and 129 were included in the final analysis. Respondents represented 86 US clinical centers. Uptake varied: 14 respondents (10.8%) were unaware of the new guidelines, 103 (79.8%) had implemented or were planning to implement the new guidelines, and 12 (9.3%) were not planning to implement the guidelines. The table summarizes variability in pre-delivery VL suppression and mixed feeding criteria used by 117 respondents who are either planning/already implementing guidelines or who are unaware of guidelines. Areas of concern revealed by thematic analysis included insufficient data to support guidelines and lack of specific criteria for implementation. Conclusion We identified substantial heterogeneity in provider uptake and comfort with new breastfeeding guidelines among US pediatric infectious diseases practitioners, and variability in assessment of safety to breastfeed. Further research is essential to explore patient preferences, define necessary follow-up, and address provider concerns regarding insufficient data to support guidelines and lack of specific criteria for implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piae093.042
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New US DHHS Guidelines for Feeding of HIV Exposed Infants: Uptake, Practice Variability and Concerns

Jeffrey I. Campbell, Diana F. Clarke, Stephen I. Pelton, Sharon Vuppula et al.
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

New US DHHS Guidelines for Feeding of HIV Exposed Infants: Uptake, Practice Variability and Concerns

Jeffrey I. Campbell, Diana F. Clarke, Stephen I. Pelton, Sharon Vuppula, Ilan Rozen Eisenberg, Ellen Cooper
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Approximately 5000 infants are born to mothers living with HIV annually in the US. In the past, the Center for Disease Control (CDC), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) have recommended that people living with HIV (PWH) not breast/chest feed their infants. Recent changes published in January 2023 in the “Section on Infant Feeding for Individuals Living with HIV” in the US DHHS HIV Guidelines, now include that individuals with HIV who are on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with a sustained undetectable viral load (VL) and who choose to breastfeed should be supported in this decision. We evaluated the uptake of these guidelines, and practice variability across providers who care for such mothers and infants. Methods We surveyed Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society members who practice clinically in the US, via an internal email list serve. The ten-question survey assessed uptake of the updated DHHS guidelines and respondents’ clinical practice in three key areas that are subject to interpretation in the guidelines: VL control, mixed feeding, and ART prophylaxis. We used descriptive statistics to examine guideline uptake and variability in practice. We used inductive qualitative thematic analysis to identify themes in open-ended survey responses. Results Of 915 individuals who opened the survey, 165 responded and 129 were included in the final analysis. Respondents represented 86 US clinical centers. Uptake varied: 14 respondents (10.8%) were unaware of the new guidelines, 103 (79.8%) had implemented or were planning to implement the new guidelines, and 12 (9.3%) were not planning to implement the guidelines. The table summarizes variability in pre-delivery VL suppression and mixed feeding criteria used by 117 respondents who are either planning/already implementing guidelines or who are unaware of guidelines. Areas of concern revealed by thematic analysis included insufficient data to support guidelines and lack of specific criteria for implementation. Conclusion We identified substantial heterogeneity in provider uptake and comfort with new breastfeeding guidelines among US pediatric infectious diseases practitioners, and variability in assessment of safety to breastfeed. Further research is essential to explore patient preferences, define necessary follow-up, and address provider concerns regarding insufficient data to support guidelines and lack of specific criteria for implementation.

Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases SocietyVol. 13(Supplement_4)
Boston Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.