De realiteit voorbij het Haagse beleid

The reality beyond Dutch policy ambitions: Causes of the gap between ambitious foreign policy and reality The recently published IOB evaluation on Dutch efforts to promote stability in fragile contexts identifies an incompatible gap between the ambitious policy goals and the limited sphere of influence of the policy. This article discusses four structural causes behind this gap. First, policy goals are generally too focused on the political context in The Hague, with insufficient attention given to the specific context in which the policy is to be implemented. Second, the fear of negative publicity hinders a transparent flow of information about policy results. Third, there is not enough focus on learning from the implementation of policy in fragile and conflict-affected areas. Finally, insufficient consideration is given – even in advance – to existing knowledge and insights from research and evaluation. The gap between unrealistic objectives and the limited sphere of influence is problematic; when political ambitions and promises are not fulfilled, it can undermine support and trust.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bestuurskunde
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/bk/092733872024033003002
Primary Topic
Global Political and Social Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De realiteit voorbij het Haagse beleid

Caspar Lobbrecht, Rens Willems
Bestuurskunde
Global Political and Social Dynamics
article

De realiteit voorbij het Haagse beleid

Caspar Lobbrecht, Rens Willems
article en

Abstract

The reality beyond Dutch policy ambitions: Causes of the gap between ambitious foreign policy and reality The recently published IOB evaluation on Dutch efforts to promote stability in fragile contexts identifies an incompatible gap between the ambitious policy goals and the limited sphere of influence of the policy. This article discusses four structural causes behind this gap. First, policy goals are generally too focused on the political context in The Hague, with insufficient attention given to the specific context in which the policy is to be implemented. Second, the fear of negative publicity hinders a transparent flow of information about policy results. Third, there is not enough focus on learning from the implementation of policy in fragile and conflict-affected areas. Finally, insufficient consideration is given – even in advance – to existing knowledge and insights from research and evaluation. The gap between unrealistic objectives and the limited sphere of influence is problematic; when political ambitions and promises are not fulfilled, it can undermine support and trust.

BestuurskundeVol. 33(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Global Political and Social Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

De realiteit voorbij het Haagse beleid — Caspar Lobbrecht, Rens Willems · Bestuurskunde (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS