Incidence and risk factors of prolonged recovery during procedural sedation in pediatrics

Background Sedation-related adverse events not only referred to a cause for morbidity and mortality but also included events that could disrupt routine procedures and thus lead to reduced procedural efficiency or quality. To date, no literature is available to predict the risk factors associated with prolonged recovery in pediatric patients during procedural sedation. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed the two-year sedation data to explore the above questions. Methods Pediatric patients who underwent procedural sedation between January 2022 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to sedation duration <120 min (Non-prolonged recovery group); or ≧ 120 min (Prolonged recovery group). The primary outcome was the incidence of prolonged recovery. Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery were assessed. Results A total of 30,003 patients were identified; 854 (2.8%) developed prolonged recovery during procedural sedation. By multivariate regression, a higher body weight (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01–1.05), outpatients (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.07–1.59), patients with sedation history (OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.07–1.44), and patients received chloral hydrate (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.06–2.03), were associated with increased odds of the prolonged recovery with the initial sedative(s). Conclusion Monitoring time needs to be extended in patients with sedation history, those with heavier weights, outpatients, and those who received chloral hydrate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1466205
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence and risk factors of prolonged recovery during procedural sedation in pediatrics

Lu Kang, Yu Cui, Qixia Mu, Qunying Wu et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Medicine
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
0.64
article

Incidence and risk factors of prolonged recovery during procedural sedation in pediatrics

Lu Kang, Yu Cui, Qixia Mu, Qunying Wu, Yani He, Qin Chen, Min Tang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Sedation-related adverse events not only referred to a cause for morbidity and mortality but also included events that could disrupt routine procedures and thus lead to reduced procedural efficiency or quality. To date, no literature is available to predict the risk factors associated with prolonged recovery in pediatric patients during procedural sedation. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed the two-year sedation data to explore the above questions. Methods Pediatric patients who underwent procedural sedation between January 2022 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to sedation duration <120 min (Non-prolonged recovery group); or ≧ 120 min (Prolonged recovery group). The primary outcome was the incidence of prolonged recovery. Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery were assessed. Results A total of 30,003 patients were identified; 854 (2.8%) developed prolonged recovery during procedural sedation. By multivariate regression, a higher body weight (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01–1.05), outpatients (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.07–1.59), patients with sedation history (OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.07–1.44), and patients received chloral hydrate (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.06–2.03), were associated with increased odds of the prolonged recovery with the initial sedative(s). Conclusion Monitoring time needs to be extended in patients with sedation history, those with heavier weights, outpatients, and those who received chloral hydrate.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 11
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.