Worker-centered evaluation and redesign of manufacturing tasks for ergonomics improvement using axiomatic design principles

Humans are considered the most valuable resource in manufacturing systems thanks to their craftsmanship, dexterity, and autonomy significantly affecting productivity, quality, and the overall company competitiveness. This paper introduces the SAGE (Systematic Approach to Generating Ergonomic Manufacturing tasks) methodology, a structured approach based on Axiomatic Design principles to integrate Human Factors evaluation early in the operations design phase and redesign manufacturing tasks to improve operators well-being. The primary objective is to mitigate discomfort and safety risks that often lead to musculoskeletal disorders, absenteeism, and production delays. SAGE provides a comprehensive framework for assessing ergonomic aspects of manufacturing tasks and identifying the need for redesign. It offers a detailed set of Functional Requirements (FRs) for reference, assesses FR satisfaction, evaluates task complexity using the Independence Axiom, and examines the intensity of FR satisfaction through the Information Axiom. The methodology includes specific implementation guidelines, ensuring its applicability across diverse manufacturing contexts. Its effectiveness is demonstrated through a large-scale parts assembly case study inspired by the bus and coach industrial sector, where a production engineer evaluated a windows assembly task and identified ergonomic design interventions. A comparative analysis with other relevant methods is finally presented, highlighting the approach's effectiveness. ● A structured Axiomatic Design-based methodology for human-centric evaluation of manufacturing tasks. ● Comprehensive consideration of factors influencing human performance and well-being. ● Design requirements based on ergonomics (physical, cognitive, organizational), user acceptance and working environment. ● Identification of task design interventions for the improvement of human well-being and performance. ● Validation of the method in a case study inspired by the bus and coach sector for user-centric evaluation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.10.001
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Human Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worker-centered evaluation and redesign of manufacturing tasks for ergonomics improvement using axiomatic design principles

George Kokotinis, Sotiris Makris, George Michalos, Zoi Arkouli
9 citations
CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology
Ergonomics and Human Factors
1.66
article

Worker-centered evaluation and redesign of manufacturing tasks for ergonomics improvement using axiomatic design principles

George Kokotinis, Sotiris Makris, George Michalos, Zoi Arkouli
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Humans are considered the most valuable resource in manufacturing systems thanks to their craftsmanship, dexterity, and autonomy significantly affecting productivity, quality, and the overall company competitiveness. This paper introduces the SAGE (Systematic Approach to Generating Ergonomic Manufacturing tasks) methodology, a structured approach based on Axiomatic Design principles to integrate Human Factors evaluation early in the operations design phase and redesign manufacturing tasks to improve operators well-being. The primary objective is to mitigate discomfort and safety risks that often lead to musculoskeletal disorders, absenteeism, and production delays. SAGE provides a comprehensive framework for assessing ergonomic aspects of manufacturing tasks and identifying the need for redesign. It offers a detailed set of Functional Requirements (FRs) for reference, assesses FR satisfaction, evaluates task complexity using the Independence Axiom, and examines the intensity of FR satisfaction through the Information Axiom. The methodology includes specific implementation guidelines, ensuring its applicability across diverse manufacturing contexts. Its effectiveness is demonstrated through a large-scale parts assembly case study inspired by the bus and coach industrial sector, where a production engineer evaluated a windows assembly task and identified ergonomic design interventions. A comparative analysis with other relevant methods is finally presented, highlighting the approach's effectiveness. ● A structured Axiomatic Design-based methodology for human-centric evaluation of manufacturing tasks. ● Comprehensive consideration of factors influencing human performance and well-being. ● Design requirements based on ergonomics (physical, cognitive, organizational), user acceptance and working environment. ● Identification of task design interventions for the improvement of human well-being and performance. ● Validation of the method in a case study inspired by the bus and coach sector for user-centric evaluation

CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technologyVol. 55
University of Patras (GR)
H2020 LEIT Advanced Manufacturing and Processing
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ergonomics and Human Factors
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.