A Systematic Literature Review on Consultant Competencies

The purpose of this study is to analyze previous research on consultant competencies, which has developed from various perspectives, and to suggest directions and implications for future research. Using a systematic literature review method, 42 domestic academic journal articles were selected for analysis, focusing on the publication period, journal type, keywords, and competencies required in different consulting fields. The findings are as follows: First, research on consultant competencies was minimal before 2010 but has increased significantly since. Second, journals show that consultant competencies are needed in diverse fields, with digital technology, talent development, and convergent thinking being key. University-affiliated institutions have contributed to strengthening the theoretical foundation through various methodologies. Third, keyword analysis highlighted relationship-building skills, service quality, and knowledge as essential competencies. Fourth, the analysis identified the need for a systematic competency model, emphasizing problem-solving, communication, customer orientation, change management, and adaptability. Based on these findings, this study highlights the need for systematic research on competencies within the consulting process from a macro perspective, while also emphasizing the importance of expanding research on consultants' intrinsic competencies from a micro perspective. Furthermore, it suggests that the application of methodologies combining various academic perspectives in a convergent approach should be expanded. This study is expected to serve as a foundational resource for future research on consultant competencies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korea Association of Education Consulting and Coaching
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31137/ecc.2024.8.3.57
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Literature Review on Consultant Competencies

Ji‐Hee Yang, Insook kim
The Korea Association of Education Consulting and Coaching
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

A Systematic Literature Review on Consultant Competencies

Ji‐Hee Yang, Insook kim
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze previous research on consultant competencies, which has developed from various perspectives, and to suggest directions and implications for future research. Using a systematic literature review method, 42 domestic academic journal articles were selected for analysis, focusing on the publication period, journal type, keywords, and competencies required in different consulting fields. The findings are as follows: First, research on consultant competencies was minimal before 2010 but has increased significantly since. Second, journals show that consultant competencies are needed in diverse fields, with digital technology, talent development, and convergent thinking being key. University-affiliated institutions have contributed to strengthening the theoretical foundation through various methodologies. Third, keyword analysis highlighted relationship-building skills, service quality, and knowledge as essential competencies. Fourth, the analysis identified the need for a systematic competency model, emphasizing problem-solving, communication, customer orientation, change management, and adaptability. Based on these findings, this study highlights the need for systematic research on competencies within the consulting process from a macro perspective, while also emphasizing the importance of expanding research on consultants' intrinsic competencies from a micro perspective. Furthermore, it suggests that the application of methodologies combining various academic perspectives in a convergent approach should be expanded. This study is expected to serve as a foundational resource for future research on consultant competencies.

The Korea Association of Education Consulting and CoachingVol. 8(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.