Development and validation of teacher artificial intelligence (AI) competence self-efficacy (TAICS) scale

Abstract Evaluating teacher AI competence levels and building effective, safe, and healthy learning environment are crucial steps in transitioning to AI-based education. Current established digital competence frameworks may indirectly address AI competence but often overlook the impact of AI on society, ethics, and assessment. Research on teacher AI competence is at its first stage, primarily focusing on theoretical and professional discussions, along with qualitative investigations. This study aims to propose and confirm the reliability and validity of a scale measuring teacher AI competence self-efficacy (TAICS) in K-12 education. The scale was developed using a Delphi method, and includes six dimensions: AI knowledge, AI pedagogy, AI assessments, AI ethics, human-centered education, and professional engagement. Each dimension contains four items. The scale was evaluated on a sample of 434 K-12 teachers through confirmatory factor analysis and model comparisons. The analyses showed that the scale is consistent across male and female teachers, as well as scientific and non-science teachers. The completed TAICS scale consists of 24 items and encompasses six dimensions of AI competence. It can be used to examine interventions and correlational research, as well as to inform the creation of new strategies and policies for AI in relation to teacher AI competence development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13094-z
Citations
56
Primary Topic
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
117.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of teacher artificial intelligence (AI) competence self-efficacy (TAICS) scale

Thomas K. F. Chiu, Murat Çoban, Zubair Ahmad
56 citations
Education and Information Technologies
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
117.37
article

Development and validation of teacher artificial intelligence (AI) competence self-efficacy (TAICS) scale

Thomas K. F. Chiu, Murat Çoban, Zubair Ahmad
article en
56 citations

Abstract

Abstract Evaluating teacher AI competence levels and building effective, safe, and healthy learning environment are crucial steps in transitioning to AI-based education. Current established digital competence frameworks may indirectly address AI competence but often overlook the impact of AI on society, ethics, and assessment. Research on teacher AI competence is at its first stage, primarily focusing on theoretical and professional discussions, along with qualitative investigations. This study aims to propose and confirm the reliability and validity of a scale measuring teacher AI competence self-efficacy (TAICS) in K-12 education. The scale was developed using a Delphi method, and includes six dimensions: AI knowledge, AI pedagogy, AI assessments, AI ethics, human-centered education, and professional engagement. Each dimension contains four items. The scale was evaluated on a sample of 434 K-12 teachers through confirmatory factor analysis and model comparisons. The analyses showed that the scale is consistent across male and female teachers, as well as scientific and non-science teachers. The completed TAICS scale consists of 24 items and encompasses six dimensions of AI competence. It can be used to examine interventions and correlational research, as well as to inform the creation of new strategies and policies for AI in relation to teacher AI competence development.

Education and Information TechnologiesVol. 30(5)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Qatar University (QA), Atatürk University (TR)
University Grants Committee, Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
117.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.