A Comparative Research on the Effectiveness of Progressive versus Proportional Tax Systems in Enhancing Social Justice

This research investigates the effectiveness of progressive and proportional tax systems in promoting social justice from the perspectives of tax law and accounting. Each system presents its own advantages and disadvantages. While progressive taxation is considered more vertically equitable, it may induce economic distortions—inefficiencies that disrupt market dynamics and prevent economic agents from maximizing social welfare. In contrast, proportional taxes are simpler and more efficient but are less equitable in their distribution of the tax burden. This study identifies critical challenges, including weak law enforcement characterized by inconsistent application of laws and a tendency for those in power to evade accountability, as well as low taxpayer compliance and discrepancies between tax law and accounting standards. To achieve optimal social justice, this research advocates for a hybrid approach that integrates elements from both tax systems, harmonizes regulations, and enhances taxpayer compliance through improved law enforcement and public education initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative and Environmental Law Review
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v5i2.3479
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Research on the Effectiveness of Progressive versus Proportional Tax Systems in Enhancing Social Justice

Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril, Hamida Hasan
3 citations
Administrative and Environmental Law Review
Taxation and Compliance Studies
3.39
article

A Comparative Research on the Effectiveness of Progressive versus Proportional Tax Systems in Enhancing Social Justice

Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril, Hamida Hasan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This research investigates the effectiveness of progressive and proportional tax systems in promoting social justice from the perspectives of tax law and accounting. Each system presents its own advantages and disadvantages. While progressive taxation is considered more vertically equitable, it may induce economic distortions—inefficiencies that disrupt market dynamics and prevent economic agents from maximizing social welfare. In contrast, proportional taxes are simpler and more efficient but are less equitable in their distribution of the tax burden. This study identifies critical challenges, including weak law enforcement characterized by inconsistent application of laws and a tendency for those in power to evade accountability, as well as low taxpayer compliance and discrepancies between tax law and accounting standards. To achieve optimal social justice, this research advocates for a hybrid approach that integrates elements from both tax systems, harmonizes regulations, and enhances taxpayer compliance through improved law enforcement and public education initiatives.

Administrative and Environmental Law ReviewVol. 5(2)
Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.