Sexing animals using biometry: Intra-pair comparison is often superior to discriminant functions

In sexually monomorphic animal species it is difficult to sex unknown individuals. The most widely used method of sexing in those cases is discriminant analysis. In species that are socially monogamous and have biparental care, however, there exists another method which utilises the intra-pair difference in the trait used in sexing. Equations for calculating the fraction of wrongly sexed individuals using both methods are given and used to show that the latter method is more exact than discriminant analysis. The advantages and limits of both methods are compared. Field data from the kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) are used to exemplify the intra-pair comparison method, and to test the assumptions underlying this method for this species. Among other things, it is shown that kittiwakes display random mating with respect to head+bill length. Sexing kittiwakes at Hornøya, northern Norway, by intra-pair differences in head+bill length gives correct results in 96% of the cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fauna norvegica
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5324/fn.v21i0.5993
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Identification and Quantification in Food
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sexing animals using biometry: Intra-pair comparison is often superior to discriminant functions

Hanno Sandvik
4 citations
Fauna norvegica
Identification and Quantification in Food
article

Sexing animals using biometry: Intra-pair comparison is often superior to discriminant functions

Hanno Sandvik
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In sexually monomorphic animal species it is difficult to sex unknown individuals. The most widely used method of sexing in those cases is discriminant analysis. In species that are socially monogamous and have biparental care, however, there exists another method which utilises the intra-pair difference in the trait used in sexing. Equations for calculating the fraction of wrongly sexed individuals using both methods are given and used to show that the latter method is more exact than discriminant analysis. The advantages and limits of both methods are compared. Field data from the kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) are used to exemplify the intra-pair comparison method, and to test the assumptions underlying this method for this species. Among other things, it is shown that kittiwakes display random mating with respect to head+bill length. Sexing kittiwakes at Hornøya, northern Norway, by intra-pair differences in head+bill length gives correct results in 96% of the cases.

Fauna norvegicaVol. 21
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Identification and Quantification in Food
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sexing animals using biometry: Intra-pair comparison is often superior to discriminant functions — Hanno Sandvik · Fauna norvegica (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS