Comparative analysis of two rolling methods for producing rail axles

This paper reports the results of a comparative analysis of two rolling methods that were used to produce rail axles. One was cross wedge rolling conducted with the use of flat plates, and the other was skew rolling conducted with the use of three rollers and one chuck. The analysis involved performing numerical calculations based on the finite element method. It was assumed that the part would be made of steel grade C35 and hot formed in a scale of 1:5. Numerical results were used to compare selected parameters of parts rolled by the two methods, including the distributions of stress, strain and Cockcroft-Latham ductile fracture criterion, as well as energy consumption of the two processes. It was found that all the analysed technological aspects primarily depended on the rolling method applied.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Manufacturing Letters
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24840/2795-5168_002-001_2724
Primary Topic
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of two rolling methods for producing rail axles

Konrad Lis, Łukasz Wójcik, Tomasz Bulzak, Grzegorz Winiarski
Engineering Manufacturing Letters
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
article

Comparative analysis of two rolling methods for producing rail axles

Konrad Lis, Łukasz Wójcik, Tomasz Bulzak, Grzegorz Winiarski
article en

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a comparative analysis of two rolling methods that were used to produce rail axles. One was cross wedge rolling conducted with the use of flat plates, and the other was skew rolling conducted with the use of three rollers and one chuck. The analysis involved performing numerical calculations based on the finite element method. It was assumed that the part would be made of steel grade C35 and hot formed in a scale of 1:5. Numerical results were used to compare selected parameters of parts rolled by the two methods, including the distributions of stress, strain and Cockcroft-Latham ductile fracture criterion, as well as energy consumption of the two processes. It was found that all the analysed technological aspects primarily depended on the rolling method applied.

Engineering Manufacturing LettersVol. 2(1)
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.