A Typology of Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Prosocial Decisions

This theoretical article summarizes the various psychological and motivational processes that underlie prosocial decision-making. To this aim, we propose a novel way to organize and synthesize research related to emotions, thoughts, and beliefs (i.e., psychological mechanisms) that motivate or demotivate human prosociality. This is done with a new typology including four overarching interrelated categories, each encompassing multiple subcategories: (a) emotions; (b) moral principles; (c) anticipated impact; and (d) anticipated personal consequences. We highlight differences and commonalities to other influential frameworks and showcase how the proposed typology can help researchers and practitioners better differentiate and understand the diverse psychological mechanisms that underlie human prosociality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640241280983
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Typology of Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Prosocial Decisions

Arvid Erlandsson, Stephan Dickert
8 citations
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Cultural Differences and Values
5.15
article

A Typology of Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Prosocial Decisions

Arvid Erlandsson, Stephan Dickert
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This theoretical article summarizes the various psychological and motivational processes that underlie prosocial decision-making. To this aim, we propose a novel way to organize and synthesize research related to emotions, thoughts, and beliefs (i.e., psychological mechanisms) that motivate or demotivate human prosociality. This is done with a new typology including four overarching interrelated categories, each encompassing multiple subcategories: (a) emotions; (b) moral principles; (c) anticipated impact; and (d) anticipated personal consequences. We highlight differences and commonalities to other influential frameworks and showcase how the proposed typology can help researchers and practitioners better differentiate and understand the diverse psychological mechanisms that underlie human prosociality.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyVol. 54(4)
Linköping University (SE), Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural Differences and Values
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Typology of Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Prosocial Decisions — Arvid Erlandsson, Stephan Dickert · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS