An Interim Economic Evaluation of Sweden’s Initial COVID-19 Strategy

Sweden adopted a softer public health COVID-19 strategy than most countries by relying on recommendations rather than restrictions. Here we focus on the effects of this choice on the economy (GDP), number of deaths and severe illnesses by comparing Sweden to a comparison group consisting of Denmark and Norway, two countries similar in many aspects to Sweden but that have differed from it in terms of COVID strategies. The Swedish policy resulted in a net loss of USD 27.3 billion (USD 2,650 per capita) stemming mostly from relative loss in GDP (83% of total). Our findings suggest that the costs of the strategy in the form of (monetized) excess deaths and severe illness cannot be justified by benefits in the form of a better economic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Health Economics
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/njhe.11885
Primary Topic
Economic and Business Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Interim Economic Evaluation of Sweden’s Initial COVID-19 Strategy

Cristian Huse, Henrik Andersson
Nordic Journal of Health Economics
Economic and Business Studies
article

An Interim Economic Evaluation of Sweden’s Initial COVID-19 Strategy

Cristian Huse, Henrik Andersson
article en

Abstract

Sweden adopted a softer public health COVID-19 strategy than most countries by relying on recommendations rather than restrictions. Here we focus on the effects of this choice on the economy (GDP), number of deaths and severe illnesses by comparing Sweden to a comparison group consisting of Denmark and Norway, two countries similar in many aspects to Sweden but that have differed from it in terms of COVID strategies. The Swedish policy resulted in a net loss of USD 27.3 billion (USD 2,650 per capita) stemming mostly from relative loss in GDP (83% of total). Our findings suggest that the costs of the strategy in the form of (monetized) excess deaths and severe illness cannot be justified by benefits in the form of a better economic performance.

Nordic Journal of Health EconomicsVol. 12(1)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Toulouse School of Economics (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Economic and Business Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Interim Economic Evaluation of Sweden’s Initial COVID-19 Strategy — Cristian Huse, Henrik Andersson · Nordic Journal of Health Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS