Machine Learning and Cointegration for Wind Turbine Monitoring and Fault Detection: From a Comparative Study to a Combined Approach

Data-driven models have become powerful tools for structural and condition monitoring of engineering systems, particularly wind turbines. This paper presents a comparative analysis of common machine learning (ML) algorithms (artificial neural networks, linear regression, random forests, and gradient boosting) and a cointegration-based approach for fault detection using Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data. While ML models offer early fault prediction, the cointegration method is simpler, requires less training data, and has lower computational costs. However, it is less effective for early detection. To balance these trade-offs, we propose a cascading monitoring framework, where the ML model provides long-term predictions (outer monitoring process) and the cointegration model offers short-term verification (inner monitoring process). The cointegration model serves to confirm anomalies flagged by the ML model. By combining both models in a cascade structure, the system reduces the risk of false alarms triggered by uncertainties in the ML model alone. Furthermore, the short-term cointegration-based prediction model helps pinpoint immediate risks and mitigate the issue of prolonged downtime. This combination enhances both accuracy and reliability, as demonstrated through testing on a five-year SCADA dataset from a commercial wind turbine with a known gearbox fault.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205055
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning and Cointegration for Wind Turbine Monitoring and Fault Detection: From a Comparative Study to a Combined Approach

Phong B. Dao, Paweł Knes
13 citations
Energies
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
4.27
article

Machine Learning and Cointegration for Wind Turbine Monitoring and Fault Detection: From a Comparative Study to a Combined Approach

Phong B. Dao, Paweł Knes
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Data-driven models have become powerful tools for structural and condition monitoring of engineering systems, particularly wind turbines. This paper presents a comparative analysis of common machine learning (ML) algorithms (artificial neural networks, linear regression, random forests, and gradient boosting) and a cointegration-based approach for fault detection using Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data. While ML models offer early fault prediction, the cointegration method is simpler, requires less training data, and has lower computational costs. However, it is less effective for early detection. To balance these trade-offs, we propose a cascading monitoring framework, where the ML model provides long-term predictions (outer monitoring process) and the cointegration model offers short-term verification (inner monitoring process). The cointegration model serves to confirm anomalies flagged by the ML model. By combining both models in a cascade structure, the system reduces the risk of false alarms triggered by uncertainties in the ML model alone. Furthermore, the short-term cointegration-based prediction model helps pinpoint immediate risks and mitigate the issue of prolonged downtime. This combination enhances both accuracy and reliability, as demonstrated through testing on a five-year SCADA dataset from a commercial wind turbine with a known gearbox fault.

EnergiesVol. 17(20)
AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
4.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.