Evaluation of the Working Mechanism of a Newly Developed Powered Ankle–Foot Orthosis

Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed to children with cerebral palsy (CP). The conventional AFO successfully controls the first and second ankle rocker, but it fails to correct the third ankle rocker, which negatively effects push-off power. The current study evaluated a new powered AFO (PAFO) design, developed to address the shortcomings of the conventional AFO. Eight children with spastic CP (12.4 ± 3.4 years; GMFCS I-III; 4/4-♂/♀; 3/5-bi/unilateral) were included. Sagittal kinematic and kinetic data were collected from 20 steps during barefoot walking, with conventional AFOs and PAFOs. In the PAFO-condition, an actuation unit was attached to a hinged AFO and through push-pull cables to a backpack that was carried by the child and provided patient-specific assistance-as-needed. SnPM-analysis indicated gait cycle sections that differed significantly between conditions. For the total group, differences between the three conditions were found in ankle kinematics (49.6-66.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 88.0-100%, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and angular velocity (0.0-6.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.001; 45.1-51.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 62.2-73.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.001; 81.2-93.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Individual SnPM-analysis revealed a greater number of significant gait cycle sections for kinematics and kinetics of the ankle, knee, and hip. These individual results were heterogeneous and specific per gait pattern. In conclusion, the new PAFO improved the ankle range-of-motion, angular velocity, and power during push-off in comparison to the conventional AFO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24206562
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Working Mechanism of a Newly Developed Powered Ankle–Foot Orthosis

Laure Everaert, Luc Labey, Kaat Desloovere, Tijl Dewit et al.
1 citations
Sensors
Foot and Ankle Surgery
0.48
article

Evaluation of the Working Mechanism of a Newly Developed Powered Ankle–Foot Orthosis

Laure Everaert, Luc Labey, Kaat Desloovere, Tijl Dewit, Koen Janssens, Anja Van Campenhout, Luiza Muraru, Roy Sevit, Jolien Vanloocke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed to children with cerebral palsy (CP). The conventional AFO successfully controls the first and second ankle rocker, but it fails to correct the third ankle rocker, which negatively effects push-off power. The current study evaluated a new powered AFO (PAFO) design, developed to address the shortcomings of the conventional AFO. Eight children with spastic CP (12.4 ± 3.4 years; GMFCS I-III; 4/4-♂/♀; 3/5-bi/unilateral) were included. Sagittal kinematic and kinetic data were collected from 20 steps during barefoot walking, with conventional AFOs and PAFOs. In the PAFO-condition, an actuation unit was attached to a hinged AFO and through push-pull cables to a backpack that was carried by the child and provided patient-specific assistance-as-needed. SnPM-analysis indicated gait cycle sections that differed significantly between conditions. For the total group, differences between the three conditions were found in ankle kinematics (49.6-66.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 88.0-100%, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and angular velocity (0.0-6.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.001; 45.1-51.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 62.2-73.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.001; 81.2-93.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Individual SnPM-analysis revealed a greater number of significant gait cycle sections for kinematics and kinetics of the ankle, knee, and hip. These individual results were heterogeneous and specific per gait pattern. In conclusion, the new PAFO improved the ankle range-of-motion, angular velocity, and power during push-off in comparison to the conventional AFO.

SensorsVol. 24(20)
KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.