‘Is it a positive or a negative?’ Children’s participation in discharge of care order proceedings

This paper explores the involvement of children in discharge of care applications and the tensions children’s guardians and other stakeholders may face when aiming to both uphold children’s rights to participate and their right to protection from harm. Using Lundy’s (2007) model of participation and drawing on qualitative interviews and a focus group with 41 family justice professionals and data from 209 electronic records relating to 327 children, this paper explores the extent to which children are given space, voice, audience and influence within discharge proceedings. In principle professionals were supportive of children’s participation. The reality was more complex, with only a minority of children consulted about discharge proceedings and professionals inferring their views in many situations, for fear of causing further distress or traumatisation. The findings from the study suggests that a fifth concept, impact, should be included within Lundy’s model, whereby the potential impact of participation on children’s wellbeing is considered alongside space, voice, audience and influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Work
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2024.2408666
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Is it a positive or a negative?’ Children’s participation in discharge of care order proceedings

Beth Stone, Jo Staines, Jessica Roy
2 citations
European Journal of Social Work
Children's Rights and Participation
2.26
article

‘Is it a positive or a negative?’ Children’s participation in discharge of care order proceedings

Beth Stone, Jo Staines, Jessica Roy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the involvement of children in discharge of care applications and the tensions children’s guardians and other stakeholders may face when aiming to both uphold children’s rights to participate and their right to protection from harm. Using Lundy’s (2007) model of participation and drawing on qualitative interviews and a focus group with 41 family justice professionals and data from 209 electronic records relating to 327 children, this paper explores the extent to which children are given space, voice, audience and influence within discharge proceedings. In principle professionals were supportive of children’s participation. The reality was more complex, with only a minority of children consulted about discharge proceedings and professionals inferring their views in many situations, for fear of causing further distress or traumatisation. The findings from the study suggests that a fifth concept, impact, should be included within Lundy’s model, whereby the potential impact of participation on children’s wellbeing is considered alongside space, voice, audience and influence.

European Journal of Social WorkVol. 28(4)
University of Bristol (GB)
Nuffield Foundation
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Children's Rights and Participation
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.