Classical and Bayesian inference of Cpc$\mathcal {C}_{pc}$ for Wilson–Hilferty distribution under progressively first‐failure type‐II censoring samples

Abstract This study uses two frequentist approaches and the Bayesian method of estimation using progressively first‐failure type‐II censored data to estimate process capability index (PCI), , for the Wilson–Hilferty (WH) distribution. A competitive maximum product of spacing (MPS) method for estimation of is proposed in the frequentist method as an alternative to conventional likelihood (LK)‐based estimation. We have also taken into account the PS function in the Bayesian setup as an alternative to the conventional LK function, and both LK and PS‐based Bayesian estimates are given for . Further, the Bayes estimates are evaluated by applying Tierney–Kadane (TK) approximation method and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with the help of both LK and PS functions and Jeffrey's prior. Additionally, the approximate confidence intervals based on the suggested frequentist techniques as well as the Bayes highest posterior density (HPD) credible intervals are built for the index . In addition, two bootstrap confidence intervals are obtained. In the simulation exercise, the performance of the Bayes and traditional estimates of is assessed in terms of their mean squared errors, and the average width and coverage probabilities of the CIs and HPD intervals are compared. An actual data set from the electronic industries is reanalyzed in order to show the efficacy of the proposed index and estimation methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3671
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classical and Bayesian inference of Cpc$\mathcal {C}_{pc}$ for Wilson–Hilferty distribution under progressively first‐failure type‐II censoring samples

Riyadh R. Al‐Mosawi, Sanku Dey
1 citations
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
0.71
article

Classical and Bayesian inference of Cpc$\mathcal {C}_{pc}$ for Wilson–Hilferty distribution under progressively first‐failure type‐II censoring samples

Riyadh R. Al‐Mosawi, Sanku Dey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study uses two frequentist approaches and the Bayesian method of estimation using progressively first‐failure type‐II censored data to estimate process capability index (PCI), , for the Wilson–Hilferty (WH) distribution. A competitive maximum product of spacing (MPS) method for estimation of is proposed in the frequentist method as an alternative to conventional likelihood (LK)‐based estimation. We have also taken into account the PS function in the Bayesian setup as an alternative to the conventional LK function, and both LK and PS‐based Bayesian estimates are given for . Further, the Bayes estimates are evaluated by applying Tierney–Kadane (TK) approximation method and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with the help of both LK and PS functions and Jeffrey's prior. Additionally, the approximate confidence intervals based on the suggested frequentist techniques as well as the Bayes highest posterior density (HPD) credible intervals are built for the index . In addition, two bootstrap confidence intervals are obtained. In the simulation exercise, the performance of the Bayes and traditional estimates of is assessed in terms of their mean squared errors, and the average width and coverage probabilities of the CIs and HPD intervals are compared. An actual data set from the electronic industries is reanalyzed in order to show the efficacy of the proposed index and estimation methodology.

Quality and Reliability Engineering InternationalVol. 41(1)
Thi Qar University (IQ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.