Understanding and Supporting Debugging Workflows in CAD

One of the core promises of parametric Computer-Aided Design (CAD) is that users can easily edit their model at any point in time. However, due to the ambiguity of changing references to intermediate, updated geometry, parametric edits can lead to reference errors which are difficult to fix in practice. We claim that debugging reference errors remains challenging because CAD systems do not provide users with tools to understand where the error happened and how to fix it. To address these challenges, we prototype a graphical debugging tool, DeCAD, which helps comparing CAD model states both across operations and across edits. In a qualitative lab study, we use DeCAD as a probe to understand specific challenges that users face and what workflows they employ to overcome them. We conclude with design implications for future debugging tool developers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3654777.3676353
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and Supporting Debugging Workflows in CAD

Gilbert Bernstein, Adriana Schulz, Felix Hähnlein
1 citations
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
0.35
article

Understanding and Supporting Debugging Workflows in CAD

Gilbert Bernstein, Adriana Schulz, Felix Hähnlein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

One of the core promises of parametric Computer-Aided Design (CAD) is that users can easily edit their model at any point in time. However, due to the ambiguity of changing references to intermediate, updated geometry, parametric edits can lead to reference errors which are difficult to fix in practice. We claim that debugging reference errors remains challenging because CAD systems do not provide users with tools to understand where the error happened and how to fix it. To address these challenges, we prototype a graphical debugging tool, DeCAD, which helps comparing CAD model states both across operations and across edits. In a qualitative lab study, we use DeCAD as a probe to understand specific challenges that users face and what workflows they employ to overcome them. We conclude with design implications for future debugging tool developers.

University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.