UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UI Critique Dataset

Automated UI evaluation can be beneficial for the design process; for example, to compare different UI designs, or conduct automated heuristic evaluation. LLM-based UI evaluation, in particular, holds the promise of generalizability to a wide variety of UI types and evaluation tasks. However, current LLM-based techniques do not yet match the performance of human evaluators. We hypothesize that automatic evaluation can be improved by collecting a targeted UI feedback dataset and then using this dataset to enhance the performance of general-purpose LLMs. We present a targeted dataset of 3,059 design critiques and quality ratings for 983 mobile UIs, collected from seven designers, each with at least a year of professional design experience. We carried out an in-depth analysis to characterize the dataset’s features. We then applied this dataset to achieve a 55% performance gain in LLM-generated UI feedback via various few-shot and visual prompting techniques. We also discuss future applications of this dataset, including training a reward model for generative UI techniques, and fine-tuning a tool-agnostic multi-modal LLM that automates UI evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3654777.3676381
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UI Critique Dataset

Yang Li, Bjoern Hartmann, Peitong Duan, Gang Li et al.
10 citations
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
3.47
article

UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UI Critique Dataset

Yang Li, Bjoern Hartmann, Peitong Duan, Gang Li, C. F. Cheng
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Automated UI evaluation can be beneficial for the design process; for example, to compare different UI designs, or conduct automated heuristic evaluation. LLM-based UI evaluation, in particular, holds the promise of generalizability to a wide variety of UI types and evaluation tasks. However, current LLM-based techniques do not yet match the performance of human evaluators. We hypothesize that automatic evaluation can be improved by collecting a targeted UI feedback dataset and then using this dataset to enhance the performance of general-purpose LLMs. We present a targeted dataset of 3,059 design critiques and quality ratings for 983 mobile UIs, collected from seven designers, each with at least a year of professional design experience. We carried out an in-depth analysis to characterize the dataset’s features. We then applied this dataset to achieve a 55% performance gain in LLM-generated UI feedback via various few-shot and visual prompting techniques. We also discuss future applications of this dataset, including training a reward model for generative UI techniques, and fine-tuning a tool-agnostic multi-modal LLM that automates UI evaluation.

Google (United States) (US), Berkeley College (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
3.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UI Critique Dataset — Yang Li, Bjoern Hartmann, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS