UICrit: Enhancing Automated Design Evaluation with a UI Critique Dataset
Automated UI evaluation can be beneficial for the design process; for example, to compare different UI designs, or conduct automated heuristic evaluation. LLM-based UI evaluation, in particular, holds the promise of generalizability to a wide variety of UI types and evaluation tasks. However, current LLM-based techniques do not yet match the performance of human evaluators. We hypothesize that automatic evaluation can be improved by collecting a targeted UI feedback dataset and then using this dataset to enhance the performance of general-purpose LLMs. We present a targeted dataset of 3,059 design critiques and quality ratings for 983 mobile UIs, collected from seven designers, each with at least a year of professional design experience. We carried out an in-depth analysis to characterize the dataset’s features. We then applied this dataset to achieve a 55% performance gain in LLM-generated UI feedback via various few-shot and visual prompting techniques. We also discuss future applications of this dataset, including training a reward model for generative UI techniques, and fine-tuning a tool-agnostic multi-modal LLM that automates UI evaluation.
Authors
- Yang Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7808-5524)
- Bjoern Hartmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-0829)
- Peitong Duan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6642-9703)
- Gang Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9490-2990)
- C. F. Cheng
Institutions
- Google (United States) (US)
- Berkeley College (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3654777.3676381
- Citations
- 10
- Primary Topic
- Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.47