Single-Port Robotic Ureteroenteric Stricture Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Review

Introduction The objective of this study is to present a series of 16 cases utilizing single-port robot-assisted repair for ureteroenteric anastomosis stricture (UES). To our knowledge, this is the first case series recorded detailing successful single-port UES revision. Methods A retrospective review of all patients under a single surgeon undergoing single-port robotic revision of ureteroenteric stricture following radical cystectomy with urinary diversion at our institutions from September 2020 through July 2024 was performed. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were assessed. Results The study consisted of 3 bilateral ureteroenteric strictures and 13 unilateral strictures, more commonly on the left. Stricture length averaged 2.2 cm on the left and 2.1 cm on the right. Surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using the da Vinci SP surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, California, US). The type of stricture repair included excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) with Bricker or Wallace reconstruction or Heineke-Mikulicz (HM) repair, although one case involved the necessity of revision ileocalycostomy. Two of the 16 cases were converted from robotic to open due to extensive adhesions. The average procedure length was 265 minutes (148-440). Length of stay (LOS) ranged from 0-46 days, averaging 4.9 days. There were five postoperative complications encountered including two seromas, two incisional hernias, and an episode of urosepsis. Pre- and postoperative changes in creatinine level ranged from -0.26 to 0.3 mg/dL. No renal units were lost. No patients were readmitted following initial surgical discharge. All patients returned for follow-up; none required repeat intervention. Conclusion SP robotic repair of ureteroenteric anastomoses is safe and feasible. The risk of complications is low with a high chance of success and possibly a lower length of stay; more research is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71262
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ureteral procedures and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-Port Robotic Ureteroenteric Stricture Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Review

Lucas Wiegand, Hannah Baker, Audra Garrigan
3 citations
Cureus
Ureteral procedures and complications
1.75
article

Single-Port Robotic Ureteroenteric Stricture Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Review

Lucas Wiegand, Hannah Baker, Audra Garrigan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction The objective of this study is to present a series of 16 cases utilizing single-port robot-assisted repair for ureteroenteric anastomosis stricture (UES). To our knowledge, this is the first case series recorded detailing successful single-port UES revision. Methods A retrospective review of all patients under a single surgeon undergoing single-port robotic revision of ureteroenteric stricture following radical cystectomy with urinary diversion at our institutions from September 2020 through July 2024 was performed. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were assessed. Results The study consisted of 3 bilateral ureteroenteric strictures and 13 unilateral strictures, more commonly on the left. Stricture length averaged 2.2 cm on the left and 2.1 cm on the right. Surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using the da Vinci SP surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, California, US). The type of stricture repair included excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) with Bricker or Wallace reconstruction or Heineke-Mikulicz (HM) repair, although one case involved the necessity of revision ileocalycostomy. Two of the 16 cases were converted from robotic to open due to extensive adhesions. The average procedure length was 265 minutes (148-440). Length of stay (LOS) ranged from 0-46 days, averaging 4.9 days. There were five postoperative complications encountered including two seromas, two incisional hernias, and an episode of urosepsis. Pre- and postoperative changes in creatinine level ranged from -0.26 to 0.3 mg/dL. No renal units were lost. No patients were readmitted following initial surgical discharge. All patients returned for follow-up; none required repeat intervention. Conclusion SP robotic repair of ureteroenteric anastomoses is safe and feasible. The risk of complications is low with a high chance of success and possibly a lower length of stay; more research is warranted.

CureusVol. 16(10)
Florida International University (US), University of South Florida (US), Orlando Regional Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Ureteral procedures and complications
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.