Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news

News reporting of preprints became commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet the extent to which the public understands what preprints are is unclear. We sought to fill this gap by conducting a content analysis of 1702 definitions of the term "preprint" that were generated by the US general population and college students. We found that only about one in five people were able to define preprints in ways that align with scholarly conceptualizations of the term, although participants provided a wide array of "other" definitions of preprints that suggest at least a partial understanding of the term. Providing participants with a definition of preprints in a news article helped improve preprint understanding for the student sample, but not for the general population. Our findings shed light on misperceptions that the public has about preprints, underscoring the importance of better education about the nature of preprint research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Understanding of Science
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241268881
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news

Chelsea L. Ratcliff, Andy J. King, Rebekah Wicke, Alice Fleerackers et al.
7 citations
Public Understanding of Science
Academic Publishing and Open Access
7.36
article

Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news

Chelsea L. Ratcliff, Andy J. King, Rebekah Wicke, Alice Fleerackers, Jakob D. Jensen
article en
7 citations

Abstract

News reporting of preprints became commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet the extent to which the public understands what preprints are is unclear. We sought to fill this gap by conducting a content analysis of 1702 definitions of the term "preprint" that were generated by the US general population and college students. We found that only about one in five people were able to define preprints in ways that align with scholarly conceptualizations of the term, although participants provided a wide array of "other" definitions of preprints that suggest at least a partial understanding of the term. Providing participants with a definition of preprints in a news article helped improve preprint understanding for the student sample, but not for the general population. Our findings shed light on misperceptions that the public has about preprints, underscoring the importance of better education about the nature of preprint research.

Public Understanding of ScienceVol. 34(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Georgia (US), Simon Fraser University (CA), Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
7.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.