Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study

The integration of machine learning (ML) systems into various sectors, notably education, has great potential to transform business workflows and decision-making processes. However, this technological advancement brings forth critical ethical concerns, particularly concerning the fairness of decisions affecting diverse groups of people. Our objective was to systematically map out the landscape of ML fairness research in higher education by exploring seven key research questions. These questions span a range of topics from the types of ML algorithms used in education to the methods of fairness assessment and the results achieved in terms of equity. We included 63 primary studies published between 2002 and 2023. The most common setting for AI Fairness research are: traditional machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree), sensitive variables (gender, race, ethnicity), and various definitions of fairness (Group fairness, Demographic parity, Equalized odds). We also idenify several future research directions, including fairness assurance for multiple sensitive variables, combining different fairness concepts and metrics, open-source benchmarking tools, and fairness testing for modern ML/AI models. • A comprehensive mapping study of research on AI Fairness in education between 2002 and 2023. • Classify papers in both conceptual and empirical views of fairness in AI models for education. • Describe five directions for future research on AI Fairness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Systems and Software
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112244
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study

Anh Nguyen‐Duc, Hung Pham Ngoc, Nga Pham
9 citations
Journal of Systems and Software
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study

Anh Nguyen‐Duc, Hung Pham Ngoc, Nga Pham
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) systems into various sectors, notably education, has great potential to transform business workflows and decision-making processes. However, this technological advancement brings forth critical ethical concerns, particularly concerning the fairness of decisions affecting diverse groups of people. Our objective was to systematically map out the landscape of ML fairness research in higher education by exploring seven key research questions. These questions span a range of topics from the types of ML algorithms used in education to the methods of fairness assessment and the results achieved in terms of equity. We included 63 primary studies published between 2002 and 2023. The most common setting for AI Fairness research are: traditional machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree), sensitive variables (gender, race, ethnicity), and various definitions of fairness (Group fairness, Demographic parity, Equalized odds). We also idenify several future research directions, including fairness assurance for multiple sensitive variables, combining different fairness concepts and metrics, open-source benchmarking tools, and fairness testing for modern ML/AI models. • A comprehensive mapping study of research on AI Fairness in education between 2002 and 2023. • Classify papers in both conceptual and empirical views of fairness in AI models for education. • Describe five directions for future research on AI Fairness.

Journal of Systems and SoftwareVol. 219
University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Hanoi University (VN), VNU University of Science (VN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.