Computer-aided engineering: Quantification of the heating non-uniformity and distribution of the thermal load occurring during continuous ohmic and conventional thermal food sterilization

The characterization of continuous thermal processing (CTP) is a crucial aspect in the design and selection of technologies for the production of safe products with optimal quality retention after the thermal stress. Conventional methods for CTP characterization are constrained in their capacity to comprehensively capture the complex dynamics of fluid flow through pipelines and the different heating principles that contribute to local temperature variations. These methods rely on isolated local temperature measurements, which fail to account for the intricate interactions between temperature, heat transfer phenomena and fluid dynamics. In view of the aforementioned limitations, this study presents the implementation of a computational fluid dynamic digital model as a toolbox for the characterization and comparison of a conventional heating (CH) ultra-high temperature (UHT) sterilization process and ohmic heating (OH) UHT sterilization. This serves as a tool for an extensive and accurate comparison of the two processes. The model enabled the estimation of each technology's thermal load through the F 0 value, thereby providing a more comprehensive assessment than local temperature measurements alone. Furthermore, this approach accounted for the flow behavior throughout the sterilization process. This strategy demonstrated that 2.5 % of the food product is exposed to an up to 75.4 times the average thermal load, whereas for OH treatments only 0.4 % of the product was exposed up to 5.1 times the average thermal load. This is due to the volumetric heating feature of OH, which leads to a 54.7 % reduction in the cooking grade of the product. Furthermore, the computer-aided comparison revealed no statistically significant difference ( p -value of 0.6) between the two technologies in their capacity to inactivate Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores in terms of thermal load. This study highlights the importance of computer-aided engineering methodologies for the technological assessment of food sterilization processes prior to industrial transfer. • CFD models determined F 0 values by considering the flow and heating effects. • F 0 values were used as comparison point for different thermal technologies. • OH and CH showed similar spore inactivation in a semi-industrial scale ( p = 0.6). • OH reduces treatment time by 40.3 % and thermal load by 54.7 % at equivalent F 0 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2024.103844
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Food Drying and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computer-aided engineering: Quantification of the heating non-uniformity and distribution of the thermal load occurring during continuous ohmic and conventional thermal food sterilization

Henry Jaeger, Maximilian Gratz, Felix Schottroff, Jorge Rivera
3 citations
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
Food Drying and Modeling
1.05
article

Computer-aided engineering: Quantification of the heating non-uniformity and distribution of the thermal load occurring during continuous ohmic and conventional thermal food sterilization

Henry Jaeger, Maximilian Gratz, Felix Schottroff, Jorge Rivera
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The characterization of continuous thermal processing (CTP) is a crucial aspect in the design and selection of technologies for the production of safe products with optimal quality retention after the thermal stress. Conventional methods for CTP characterization are constrained in their capacity to comprehensively capture the complex dynamics of fluid flow through pipelines and the different heating principles that contribute to local temperature variations. These methods rely on isolated local temperature measurements, which fail to account for the intricate interactions between temperature, heat transfer phenomena and fluid dynamics. In view of the aforementioned limitations, this study presents the implementation of a computational fluid dynamic digital model as a toolbox for the characterization and comparison of a conventional heating (CH) ultra-high temperature (UHT) sterilization process and ohmic heating (OH) UHT sterilization. This serves as a tool for an extensive and accurate comparison of the two processes. The model enabled the estimation of each technology's thermal load through the F 0 value, thereby providing a more comprehensive assessment than local temperature measurements alone. Furthermore, this approach accounted for the flow behavior throughout the sterilization process. This strategy demonstrated that 2.5 % of the food product is exposed to an up to 75.4 times the average thermal load, whereas for OH treatments only 0.4 % of the product was exposed up to 5.1 times the average thermal load. This is due to the volumetric heating feature of OH, which leads to a 54.7 % reduction in the cooking grade of the product. Furthermore, the computer-aided comparison revealed no statistically significant difference ( p -value of 0.6) between the two technologies in their capacity to inactivate Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores in terms of thermal load. This study highlights the importance of computer-aided engineering methodologies for the technological assessment of food sterilization processes prior to industrial transfer. • CFD models determined F 0 values by considering the flow and heating effects. • F 0 values were used as comparison point for different thermal technologies. • OH and CH showed similar spore inactivation in a semi-industrial scale ( p = 0.6). • OH reduces treatment time by 40.3 % and thermal load by 54.7 % at equivalent F 0 .

Innovative Food Science & Emerging TechnologiesVol. 97
BOKU University (AT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Food Drying and Modeling
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.