Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux‐modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles

Abstract Direct drive permanent magnet (PM) motors have become a very attractive choice for electric vehicles. Generally, PM motors are divided into PM synchronous motors (PMSMs) and PM flux‐modulated motors (PMFMMs). High torque density is the main requirement of direct drive motors, therefore, the structure of conventional PM motors is modified to boost the torque. Increasing the number of poles is a structural modification to achieve high torque density in PMSMs; however, a large number of poles affects motor characteristics such as power factor, flux weakening, losses, and efficiency. The other way to have high torque is to use PMFMMs, which have a high intrinsic torque density. This paper first compares the performance of PMSMs with different number of poles. Then the performance of PMFMMs and PMSMs are compared to show their differences. The performance of PMFMMs with different teeth modulators and magnetic gear ratios are predicted to show their effects upon its performance. The simulation results using finite elements method|finite element method (FEM) are presented, and finally, a PMFMM with 36 slots and 40 poles as case study is subjected to an experimental test and its results are compared with FEM. The cover image is based on the article Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux‐modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles by Saeed Abareshi et al., https://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.12500 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET Electric Power Applications
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.12500
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux‐modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles

Saeed Abareshi, Mehrage Ghods, Jawad Faiz
2 citations
IET Electric Power Applications
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
0.42
article

Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux‐modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles

Saeed Abareshi, Mehrage Ghods, Jawad Faiz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Direct drive permanent magnet (PM) motors have become a very attractive choice for electric vehicles. Generally, PM motors are divided into PM synchronous motors (PMSMs) and PM flux‐modulated motors (PMFMMs). High torque density is the main requirement of direct drive motors, therefore, the structure of conventional PM motors is modified to boost the torque. Increasing the number of poles is a structural modification to achieve high torque density in PMSMs; however, a large number of poles affects motor characteristics such as power factor, flux weakening, losses, and efficiency. The other way to have high torque is to use PMFMMs, which have a high intrinsic torque density. This paper first compares the performance of PMSMs with different number of poles. Then the performance of PMFMMs and PMSMs are compared to show their differences. The performance of PMFMMs with different teeth modulators and magnetic gear ratios are predicted to show their effects upon its performance. The simulation results using finite elements method|finite element method (FEM) are presented, and finally, a PMFMM with 36 slots and 40 poles as case study is subjected to an experimental test and its results are compared with FEM. The cover image is based on the article Comparison of permanent magnet synchronous machine and permanent magnet flux‐modulated machine in direct drive considering number of rotor poles by Saeed Abareshi et al., https://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.12500 .

IET Electric Power ApplicationsVol. 18(10)
University of Tehran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.