Multi-scale analysis of urban forests and socioeconomic patterns in a desert city, Phoenix, Arizona

Understanding the relationship between various socioeconomic factors and urban forest structure is essential for directing resources to ensure equitable distribution of green space. Through a case study of a desert city, i.e., Phoenix, AZ, this study provides a novel application of Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) in which we explore the spatially variable relationships between a wide array of socioeconomic indicators and urban forest attributes. Through the computation of various scales of influence for different explanatory variables, MGWR enhances our analysis's precision and stresses the association between socioeconomic status and urban forest structure at local and regional scales. Our results indicate that although there has been a pattern of green inequality where minority and low-income communities have less access to urban forests, education levels were mostly insignificant based on the MGWR results. In some instances, higher incomes are negatively correlated with tree canopy coverage. Additionally, the stem density model outperformed the canopy coverage model in terms of prediction accuracy. This research adds a new dimension to urban forestry literature and emphasizes the value of customized urban planning strategies and the environmental justice implications of urban forestry, particularly in arid environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74208-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-scale analysis of urban forests and socioeconomic patterns in a desert city, Phoenix, Arizona

Xiang Que, Felix Haifeng Liao, Chao Fan, Xiaogang Ma et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Urban Green Space and Health
0.94
article

Multi-scale analysis of urban forests and socioeconomic patterns in a desert city, Phoenix, Arizona

Xiang Que, Felix Haifeng Liao, Chao Fan, Xiaogang Ma, Hui Wang, Zhe Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between various socioeconomic factors and urban forest structure is essential for directing resources to ensure equitable distribution of green space. Through a case study of a desert city, i.e., Phoenix, AZ, this study provides a novel application of Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) in which we explore the spatially variable relationships between a wide array of socioeconomic indicators and urban forest attributes. Through the computation of various scales of influence for different explanatory variables, MGWR enhances our analysis's precision and stresses the association between socioeconomic status and urban forest structure at local and regional scales. Our results indicate that although there has been a pattern of green inequality where minority and low-income communities have less access to urban forests, education levels were mostly insignificant based on the MGWR results. In some instances, higher incomes are negatively correlated with tree canopy coverage. Additionally, the stem density model outperformed the canopy coverage model in terms of prediction accuracy. This research adds a new dimension to urban forestry literature and emphasizes the value of customized urban planning strategies and the environmental justice implications of urban forestry, particularly in arid environments.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
New Mexico State University (US), University of Idaho (US), National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (US), Appalachian State University (US), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
National Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Urban Green Space and Health
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.