Planning for and Assessing Rigor in Rapid Qualitative Analysis (PARRQA): a consensus-based framework for designing, conducting, and reporting
Rapid qualitative methods play a central role in implementation evaluations, with the potential to yield prompt information and insights about context, processes, and relationships. However, guidance on how to assess rigor is nascent. The PARRQA framework enhances the literature by offering criteria to ensure appropriate planning for and assessment of rigor in projects that involve RQA. This framework provides a consensus-based resource to support high-level qualitative methodological rigor in implementation science.
Authors
- Erin P. Finley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4497-7721)
- Alison Brown (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3998-7212)
- Andrea L. Nevedal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3859-8493)
- Allison A. Lewinski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1356-1857)
- Amanda M. Midboe
- Christine P. Kowalski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6258-0221)
- Jessica Young (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-7166)
Institutions
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Duke University (US)
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research (US)
- Durham VA Health Care System (US)
- Center for Innovation (US)
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (US)
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Implementation Science
- Published
- 2024-10-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01397-1
- Citations
- 80
- Primary Topic
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 67.95
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative