Hope in crisis: revisiting Erich Fromm’s dialectic of transformation

In this article we explore Erich Fromm’s concept of hope within the context of contemporary social and political crises. We formulate two primary objections to his vision of a revolution of hope: the individualistic moralisation of societal problems, and the accusation that hope is persuasive and manipulative. By embedding Fromm’s ideas within a broader dialectical framework and engaging with Walter Benjamin’s thoughts on history, we reinterpret hope as a liminal, transformative state rather than a concrete, prescriptive notion. This reconceptualisation presents hope as a fundamental prerequisite for transformative political practice, emphasising its role in fostering active citizenship and collective social change. Ultimately, we argue for the critical importance of hope in navigating and overcoming the challenges of modernity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychosocial Studies
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/14786737y2024d000000029
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hope in crisis: revisiting Erich Fromm’s dialectic of transformation

Phil C. Langer, Niclas O’Donnokoé, Christopher Steffen
2 citations
Journal of Psychosocial Studies
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
1.28
article

Hope in crisis: revisiting Erich Fromm’s dialectic of transformation

Phil C. Langer, Niclas O’Donnokoé, Christopher Steffen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this article we explore Erich Fromm’s concept of hope within the context of contemporary social and political crises. We formulate two primary objections to his vision of a revolution of hope: the individualistic moralisation of societal problems, and the accusation that hope is persuasive and manipulative. By embedding Fromm’s ideas within a broader dialectical framework and engaging with Walter Benjamin’s thoughts on history, we reinterpret hope as a liminal, transformative state rather than a concrete, prescriptive notion. This reconceptualisation presents hope as a fundamental prerequisite for transformative political practice, emphasising its role in fostering active citizenship and collective social change. Ultimately, we argue for the critical importance of hope in navigating and overcoming the challenges of modernity.

Journal of Psychosocial StudiesVol. 17(3)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), International Psychoanalytic University Berlin (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.