MacArthur’s Consumer-Resource Model: A Rosetta Stone for Competitive Interactions

AbstractRecent developments in competition theory-namely, modern coexistence theory (MCT)-have aided empiricists in formulating tests of species persistence, coexistence, and evolution from simple to complex community settings. However, the parameters used to predict competitive outcomes, such as interaction coefficients, invasion growth rates, and stabilizing differences, remain biologically opaque, making findings difficult to generalize across ecological settings. This article is structured around five goals toward clarifying MCT by first making a case for the modern-day utility of MacArthur's consumer-resource model, a model with surprising complexity and depth: (i) to describe the model in uniquely accessible language, deciphering the mathematics toward cultivating deeper biological intuition about competition's inner workings regardless of what empirical toolkit one uses; (ii) to provide translation between biological mechanisms from MacArthur's model and parameters used to predict coexistence in MCT; (iii) to make explicit important but understated assumptions of MacArthur's model in plain terms; (iv) to provide empirical recommendations; and (v) to examine how key ecological concepts (e.g., <i>r</i>/<i>K</i>-selection) can be understood with renewed clarity through MacArthur's lens. We end by highlighting opportunities to explore mechanisms in tandem with MCT and to compare and translate results across ecological currencies toward a more unified ecological science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Naturalist
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733516
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MacArthur’s Consumer-Resource Model: A Rosetta Stone for Competitive Interactions

Jawad Sakarchi, Rachel M. Germain
5 citations
The American Naturalist
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
5.66
article

MacArthur’s Consumer-Resource Model: A Rosetta Stone for Competitive Interactions

Jawad Sakarchi, Rachel M. Germain
article en
5 citations

Abstract

AbstractRecent developments in competition theory-namely, modern coexistence theory (MCT)-have aided empiricists in formulating tests of species persistence, coexistence, and evolution from simple to complex community settings. However, the parameters used to predict competitive outcomes, such as interaction coefficients, invasion growth rates, and stabilizing differences, remain biologically opaque, making findings difficult to generalize across ecological settings. This article is structured around five goals toward clarifying MCT by first making a case for the modern-day utility of MacArthur's consumer-resource model, a model with surprising complexity and depth: (i) to describe the model in uniquely accessible language, deciphering the mathematics toward cultivating deeper biological intuition about competition's inner workings regardless of what empirical toolkit one uses; (ii) to provide translation between biological mechanisms from MacArthur's model and parameters used to predict coexistence in MCT; (iii) to make explicit important but understated assumptions of MacArthur's model in plain terms; (iv) to provide empirical recommendations; and (v) to examine how key ecological concepts (e.g., <i>r</i>/<i>K</i>-selection) can be understood with renewed clarity through MacArthur's lens. We end by highlighting opportunities to explore mechanisms in tandem with MCT and to compare and translate results across ecological currencies toward a more unified ecological science.

The American NaturalistVol. 205(3)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.