Incidence of revision surgery and patient-reported outcomes within 5 years of the index procedure for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis data

The most common reasons for reoperation within 5 years in the decompression-only group were repeat decompression and instability, whereas in the D+F group the most common reason was adjacent-segment disease. The need for revision resulted in modestly diminished benefit compared with patients with no revisions. These differences were greater in the fusion cohort compared with the decompression-only cohort. The mean PRO improvement still far exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds for all measures for patients who underwent a revision surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.spine24488
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence of revision surgery and patient-reported outcomes within 5 years of the index procedure for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis data

Erica F. Bisson, Mark E. Shaffrey, Jonathan R. Slotkin, Michael Y. Wang et al.
4 citations
Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.70
article

Incidence of revision surgery and patient-reported outcomes within 5 years of the index procedure for grade 1 spondylolisthesis: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis data

Erica F. Bisson, Mark E. Shaffrey, Jonathan R. Slotkin, Michael Y. Wang, Paul Park, Mladen Djurasovic, Steven D. Glassman, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Mohamad Bydon, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Jacob Birlingmair, Kevin T. Foley, Domagoj Coric, Michael S. Virk, Leah Y. Carreon, Andrew K. Chan, Dean Chou, John J. Knightly, Eric A. Potts, Vivian Le, Kai-Ming Fu, Anthony L. Asher, Regis W. Haid
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The most common reasons for reoperation within 5 years in the decompression-only group were repeat decompression and instability, whereas in the D+F group the most common reason was adjacent-segment disease. The need for revision resulted in modestly diminished benefit compared with patients with no revisions. These differences were greater in the fusion cohort compared with the decompression-only cohort. The mean PRO improvement still far exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds for all measures for patients who underwent a revision surgery.

Journal of Neurosurgery SpineVol. 42(1)
Mayo Clinic (US), University of Miami (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Norton Healthcare (US), Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates (US), Semmes Murphey Foundation (US), Indiana Spine Group (US), Duke University Hospital (US), Neurological Surgery (US), University of Virginia (US), Geisinger Health System (US), Atlantic Health System (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.