Interdependence of Support Wettability ‐ Electrodeposition Rate‐ Sodium Metal Anode and SEI Microstructure

Abstract This study examines how current collector support chemistry (sodiophilic intermetallic Na 2 Te vs. sodiophobic baseline Cu) and electrodeposition rate affect microstructure of sodium metal and its solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Capacity and current (6 mAh cm −2 , 0.5–3 mA cm −2 ) representative of commercially relevant mass loading in anode‐free sodium metal battery (AF‐SMBs) are analyzed. Synchrotron X‐ray nanotomography and grazing‐incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (GIWAXS) are combined with cryogenic ion beam (cryo‐FIB) microscopy. Highlighted are major differences in film morphology, internal porosity, and crystallographic preferred orientation e.g. (110) vs. (100) and (211) with support and deposition rate. Within the SEI, sodium fluoride (NaF) is more prevalent with Te−Cu versus sodium hydride (NaH) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with baseline Cu. Due to competitive grain growth the preferred orientation of sodium crystallites depends on film thickness. Mesoscale modeling delineates the role of SEI (ionic conductivity, morphology) on electrodeposit growth and onset of electrochemical instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Angewandte Chemie
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202412550
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interdependence of Support Wettability ‐ Electrodeposition Rate‐ Sodium Metal Anode and SEI Microstructure

Feipeng Yang, Lu Ma, Bairav S. Vishnugopi, Callum J. Campbell et al.
2 citations
Angewandte Chemie
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
0.42
article

Interdependence of Support Wettability ‐ Electrodeposition Rate‐ Sodium Metal Anode and SEI Microstructure

Feipeng Yang, Lu Ma, Bairav S. Vishnugopi, Callum J. Campbell, Jianming Bai, Ruipeng Li, Varun R. Kankanallu, Kaustubh G. Naik, Partha P. Mukherjee, Mingyuan Ge, Vikalp Raj, Aditya Singla, Dean Yen, John Watt, David Mitlin, Xiaoyin Zheng, Chonghang Zhao, Yu-chen Karen Chen-Wiegart, Yixian Wang, Chang‐An Lo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how current collector support chemistry (sodiophilic intermetallic Na 2 Te vs. sodiophobic baseline Cu) and electrodeposition rate affect microstructure of sodium metal and its solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Capacity and current (6 mAh cm −2 , 0.5–3 mA cm −2 ) representative of commercially relevant mass loading in anode‐free sodium metal battery (AF‐SMBs) are analyzed. Synchrotron X‐ray nanotomography and grazing‐incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (GIWAXS) are combined with cryogenic ion beam (cryo‐FIB) microscopy. Highlighted are major differences in film morphology, internal porosity, and crystallographic preferred orientation e.g. (110) vs. (100) and (211) with support and deposition rate. Within the SEI, sodium fluoride (NaF) is more prevalent with Te−Cu versus sodium hydride (NaH) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with baseline Cu. Due to competitive grain growth the preferred orientation of sodium crystallites depends on film thickness. Mesoscale modeling delineates the role of SEI (ionic conductivity, morphology) on electrodeposit growth and onset of electrochemical instability.

Angewandte ChemieVol. 137(8)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Brookhaven National Laboratory (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (US), National Synchrotron Light Source II, Stony Brook University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Basic Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.