Evidence‐based practices and US state government civil servants: Current use, challenges, and pathways forward

Abstract Leveraging a three‐state survey of 323 civil servants and 36 interviews, representing blue and red states, this university‐government‐nonprofit collaborative research project aims to better understand how civil servants access and use evidence in their decision‐making process. Our findings show that 54% of respondents find evidence‐based practices (EBPs) useful in making budget, policy, and contracting decisions, with 68% of civil servants anticipating future benefits from evidence use. Our hypothetical funding choice experiment indicates that civil servants prefer programs that are more recent and in their state, identify outcomes over outputs, demonstrate effectiveness for diverse demographic groups, and are evaluated by independent research entities. The main challenges in using EBPs include time constraints, resource limitations, decision‐making fragmentation, and lack of evidence for certain communities. Qualitative interviews provide valuable strategies for overcoming these challenges. We conclude this article by offering practical insights for improving the integration of EBPs in state government decision‐making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13878
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence‐based practices and US state government civil servants: Current use, challenges, and pathways forward

Chengxin Xu, Yuan Cheng, Patrick Carter, Leslie Michels Thompson et al.
5 citations
Public Administration Review
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.45
article

Evidence‐based practices and US state government civil servants: Current use, challenges, and pathways forward

Chengxin Xu, Yuan Cheng, Patrick Carter, Leslie Michels Thompson, Weston Merrick, Shuping Wang, Jules Marzec
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Leveraging a three‐state survey of 323 civil servants and 36 interviews, representing blue and red states, this university‐government‐nonprofit collaborative research project aims to better understand how civil servants access and use evidence in their decision‐making process. Our findings show that 54% of respondents find evidence‐based practices (EBPs) useful in making budget, policy, and contracting decisions, with 68% of civil servants anticipating future benefits from evidence use. Our hypothetical funding choice experiment indicates that civil servants prefer programs that are more recent and in their state, identify outcomes over outputs, demonstrate effectiveness for diverse demographic groups, and are evaluated by independent research entities. The main challenges in using EBPs include time constraints, resource limitations, decision‐making fragmentation, and lack of evidence for certain communities. Qualitative interviews provide valuable strategies for overcoming these challenges. We conclude this article by offering practical insights for improving the integration of EBPs in state government decision‐making processes.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(1)
University of Minnesota (US), Results for Development Institute (US), Minnesota Department of Human Services (US), Seattle University (US), Syracuse University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evidence‐based practices and US state government civil servants: Current use, challenges, and pathways forward — Chengxin Xu, Yuan Cheng, et al. · Public Administration Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS