Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Socioeconomic Metrics on Heart Failure Risk and Outcomes in Maryland

Introduction Annually, a significant number of Americans are hospitalized due to heart failure (HF), marking it as an important contributor to morbidity and mortality. It also poses a substantial financial burden and leads to considerable losses in productivity. Socioeconomic disparities may intensify the risk of hospital admissions following HF and worsen patient outcomes. Objective This study investigates the predictive accuracy of different socioeconomic metrics on the risk and outcomes of HF in Maryland. Methodology To evaluate the predictive accuracy of various socioeconomic metrics on the risk of HF, we utilized data from the Maryland State Inpatient Database. Our retrospective analysis covered hospital admissions for HF from 2016 to 2020, correlating these with poverty indicators derived from U.S. Census data at the zip code level with socioeconomic metrics like race/ethnicity, insurance, household median income, and neighborhood distress (Distressed Communities Index (DCI)). Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for confounders and isolated the impact of socioeconomic factors. Result During the study period, a total of 389,220 cases of HF were reported in the Maryland State Inpatient Database (SID). The majority of these patients were White individuals (56.8%) and female (51.1%), with a median age of 73 years (interquartile range (IQR) 62-82 years). The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.1%, while rates of atrial fibrillation, cardiac arrest, and prolonged hospital stay were 34.4%, 0.3%, and 48.4%, respectively. The studied socioeconomic metrics showed varying predictive power for the risk of HF-related admissions and selected outcomes, with the highest predictive accuracy for neighborhood distress on the risk of HF (AUC = 0.53, 95% CI 0.530-0.532), atrial fibrillation (AUC = 0.479, 95% CI 0.477-0.480), cardiac arrest (AUC = 0.511, 95% CI 0.498-0.525), prolonged hospital stays (AUC = 0.531, 95% CI 0.530-0.532), and mortality (AUC = 0.499, 95% CI 0.496-0.502). Conclusions The Distressed Communities Index demonstrates significant predictive power for assessing the risk of hospital admissions following HF and outcomes among individuals with HF, exceeding factors like insurance, race/ethnicity, and household median income.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69474
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Socioeconomic Metrics on Heart Failure Risk and Outcomes in Maryland

Oluwatayo J Awolumate, Kakra Hughes, Mojisola E Fasokun, Oreoluwa Adubi et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
0.40
article

Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Socioeconomic Metrics on Heart Failure Risk and Outcomes in Maryland

Oluwatayo J Awolumate, Kakra Hughes, Mojisola E Fasokun, Oreoluwa Adubi, Oluwasegun Austine Akinyemi, Miriam Micheal, Nnaemeka Agunwa, Funmilola Belie, Seun Ikugbayigbe, Oluranti O Babalola
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Annually, a significant number of Americans are hospitalized due to heart failure (HF), marking it as an important contributor to morbidity and mortality. It also poses a substantial financial burden and leads to considerable losses in productivity. Socioeconomic disparities may intensify the risk of hospital admissions following HF and worsen patient outcomes. Objective This study investigates the predictive accuracy of different socioeconomic metrics on the risk and outcomes of HF in Maryland. Methodology To evaluate the predictive accuracy of various socioeconomic metrics on the risk of HF, we utilized data from the Maryland State Inpatient Database. Our retrospective analysis covered hospital admissions for HF from 2016 to 2020, correlating these with poverty indicators derived from U.S. Census data at the zip code level with socioeconomic metrics like race/ethnicity, insurance, household median income, and neighborhood distress (Distressed Communities Index (DCI)). Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for confounders and isolated the impact of socioeconomic factors. Result During the study period, a total of 389,220 cases of HF were reported in the Maryland State Inpatient Database (SID). The majority of these patients were White individuals (56.8%) and female (51.1%), with a median age of 73 years (interquartile range (IQR) 62-82 years). The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.1%, while rates of atrial fibrillation, cardiac arrest, and prolonged hospital stay were 34.4%, 0.3%, and 48.4%, respectively. The studied socioeconomic metrics showed varying predictive power for the risk of HF-related admissions and selected outcomes, with the highest predictive accuracy for neighborhood distress on the risk of HF (AUC = 0.53, 95% CI 0.530-0.532), atrial fibrillation (AUC = 0.479, 95% CI 0.477-0.480), cardiac arrest (AUC = 0.511, 95% CI 0.498-0.525), prolonged hospital stays (AUC = 0.531, 95% CI 0.530-0.532), and mortality (AUC = 0.499, 95% CI 0.496-0.502). Conclusions The Distressed Communities Index demonstrates significant predictive power for assessing the risk of hospital admissions following HF and outcomes among individuals with HF, exceeding factors like insurance, race/ethnicity, and household median income.

CureusVol. 16(9)
Western Illinois University (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Howard University (US), Eastern Illinois University (US), University of South Carolina (US), California Miramar University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Southern Connecticut State University (US), Department of Health Services (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.