The Need for Automatic Review of Death Penalty Cases in Botswana: A Commentary on <i>Pholo v the State</i>

Abstract Given the irreversible nature of the death penalty, automatic review of death penalty cases is a necessary safeguard. The process mitigates against errors committed by the trial court and ensures that only those who are deserving are executed. In acknowledgement of this necessity, Rule 44 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal empowered the Court of Appeal of Botswana to automatically review all death penalty cases. In undertaking this review, the Court was required to satisfy itself on the soundness of the conviction and also confirm that the trial court had properly addressed the question of extenuating circumstances. However, on the 4th November 2022, in Pholo v The State,1 the Court of Appeal declared that Rule 44 was ultra vires the Court of Appeal Act. Consequently, the Court of Appeal held that it did not have jurisdiction to automatically review death penalty cases. This paper assesses the reasoning of the Court in the case and the implications of the judgment. The paper recommends amendment of the Court of Appeal Act to properly clothe the Court of Appeal with jurisdiction to automatically review death penalty cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statute Law Review
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae051
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Need for Automatic Review of Death Penalty Cases in Botswana: A Commentary on Pholo v the State

Baboki Jonathan Dambe
Statute Law Review
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

The Need for Automatic Review of Death Penalty Cases in Botswana: A Commentary on Pholo v the State

Baboki Jonathan Dambe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Given the irreversible nature of the death penalty, automatic review of death penalty cases is a necessary safeguard. The process mitigates against errors committed by the trial court and ensures that only those who are deserving are executed. In acknowledgement of this necessity, Rule 44 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal empowered the Court of Appeal of Botswana to automatically review all death penalty cases. In undertaking this review, the Court was required to satisfy itself on the soundness of the conviction and also confirm that the trial court had properly addressed the question of extenuating circumstances. However, on the 4th November 2022, in Pholo v The State,1 the Court of Appeal declared that Rule 44 was ultra vires the Court of Appeal Act. Consequently, the Court of Appeal held that it did not have jurisdiction to automatically review death penalty cases. This paper assesses the reasoning of the Court in the case and the implications of the judgment. The paper recommends amendment of the Court of Appeal Act to properly clothe the Court of Appeal with jurisdiction to automatically review death penalty cases.

Statute Law ReviewVol. 45(3)
University of Botswana (BW)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Need for Automatic Review of Death Penalty Cases in Botswana: A Commentary on <i>Pholo v the State</i> — Baboki Jonathan Dambe · Statute Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS