Efficacy and Safety of Admilparant, an LPA1 Antagonist, in Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

<b>Rationale:</b> Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) have high morbidity and mortality; thus, novel treatments are needed. <b>Objectives:</b> Assess efficacy and safety of admilparant (BMS-986278), an oral lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 antagonist, in patients with IPF and PPF. <b>Methods:</b> This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included parallel cohorts of patients with IPF (<i>n</i> = 278 randomized, <i>n</i> = 276 treated) or PPF (<i>n</i> = 125 randomized, <i>n</i> = 123 treated) who received 30 mg of admilparant, 60 mg of admilparant, or placebo (1:1:1) twice daily for 26 weeks. Background antifibrotics (both cohorts) and immunosuppressants (PPF only) were permitted. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Rates of change in percentage of predicted FVC over 26 weeks for IPF were -2.7% (placebo), -2.8% (30 mg), and -1.2% (60 mg) and for PPF were -4.3% (placebo), -2.9% (30 mg), and -1.1% (60 mg). Treatment differences between 60-mg admilparant and placebo were 1.4% (95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 3.0) for IPF and 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 5.7) for PPF. Treatment effect was observed with or without background antifibrotics in both cohorts. Diarrhea occurred at similar frequencies in admilparant arms versus placebo. Transient Day 1 postdose blood pressure reductions were observed in all arms in both cohorts but were greater with admilparant. Treatment discontinuations because of adverse events were similar across IPF arms and lower with admilparant (2.5% [30 mg]; 0% [60 mg]) versus placebo (17.1%) for PPF. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this first phase 2 study to evaluate antifibrotic treatment in parallel IPF and PPF cohorts, 60-mg admilparant slowed lung function decline and was safe and well tolerated, supporting further evaluation in phase 3 trials. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov identifier (NCT04308681).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202405-0977oc
Citations
38
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Admilparant, an LPA1 Antagonist, in Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Michael Kreuter, Jürgen Behr, Tamera J. Corte, Vincent Cottin et al.
38 citations
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
15.92
article

Efficacy and Safety of Admilparant, an LPA1 Antagonist, in Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Michael Kreuter, Jürgen Behr, Tamera J. Corte, Vincent Cottin, Hideaki Watanabe, Aryeh Fischer, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Toby M. Maher, Brandon Elpers, Marilyn K. Glassberg, Elchonon M. Berkowitz, Fernando J. Martínez, Takashi Ogura, Sinae Kim, Takafumi Suda
article en
38 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) have high morbidity and mortality; thus, novel treatments are needed. <b>Objectives:</b> Assess efficacy and safety of admilparant (BMS-986278), an oral lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 antagonist, in patients with IPF and PPF. <b>Methods:</b> This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included parallel cohorts of patients with IPF (<i>n</i> = 278 randomized, <i>n</i> = 276 treated) or PPF (<i>n</i> = 125 randomized, <i>n</i> = 123 treated) who received 30 mg of admilparant, 60 mg of admilparant, or placebo (1:1:1) twice daily for 26 weeks. Background antifibrotics (both cohorts) and immunosuppressants (PPF only) were permitted. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Rates of change in percentage of predicted FVC over 26 weeks for IPF were -2.7% (placebo), -2.8% (30 mg), and -1.2% (60 mg) and for PPF were -4.3% (placebo), -2.9% (30 mg), and -1.1% (60 mg). Treatment differences between 60-mg admilparant and placebo were 1.4% (95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 3.0) for IPF and 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 5.7) for PPF. Treatment effect was observed with or without background antifibrotics in both cohorts. Diarrhea occurred at similar frequencies in admilparant arms versus placebo. Transient Day 1 postdose blood pressure reductions were observed in all arms in both cohorts but were greater with admilparant. Treatment discontinuations because of adverse events were similar across IPF arms and lower with admilparant (2.5% [30 mg]; 0% [60 mg]) versus placebo (17.1%) for PPF. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this first phase 2 study to evaluate antifibrotic treatment in parallel IPF and PPF cohorts, 60-mg admilparant slowed lung function decline and was safe and well tolerated, supporting further evaluation in phase 3 trials. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov identifier (NCT04308681).

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineVol. 211(2)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), University of Southern California (US), The University of Sydney (AU), Loyola University Chicago (US), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Cornell University (US), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Erasmus MC (NL), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Presbyterian Hospital (US), German Center for Lung Research (DE), Hôpital Louis Pradel (FR), Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center (JP), Imperial College London (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
15.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.