Future constructions in English and Norwegian

Abstract The choice between the future constructions will/shall and BE going to is among the most well-investigated topics in English linguistics. A host of semantic, pragmatic, and syntactic factors has been suggested to drive the alternation between these constructions. Recent research has taken a contrastive perspective and investigated whether similar factors also apply to Norwegian, which shows a very similar alternation ( skal/vil vs. kommer til å ). This paper follows up on this line of research, taking new data into account. Drawing on the Open American National Corpus (OANC) and the Spoken BNC2014 for English on the one hand and the NoTa corpus as well as the Big Brother corpus for Norwegian, we carve out commonalities and differences between the alternation patterns in English and Norwegian, and we argue that in both languages, it may actually be semantic, rather than structural, aspects that play the most crucial role in language users’ choice between competing future constructions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Languages in Contrast
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00043.mik
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future constructions in English and Norwegian

Stefan Hartmann, Olaf Mikkelsen
2 citations
Languages in Contrast
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
5.56
article

Future constructions in English and Norwegian

Stefan Hartmann, Olaf Mikkelsen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The choice between the future constructions will/shall and BE going to is among the most well-investigated topics in English linguistics. A host of semantic, pragmatic, and syntactic factors has been suggested to drive the alternation between these constructions. Recent research has taken a contrastive perspective and investigated whether similar factors also apply to Norwegian, which shows a very similar alternation ( skal/vil vs. kommer til å ). This paper follows up on this line of research, taking new data into account. Drawing on the Open American National Corpus (OANC) and the Spoken BNC2014 for English on the one hand and the NoTa corpus as well as the Big Brother corpus for Norwegian, we carve out commonalities and differences between the alternation patterns in English and Norwegian, and we argue that in both languages, it may actually be semantic, rather than structural, aspects that play the most crucial role in language users’ choice between competing future constructions.

Languages in ContrastVol. 24(2)
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Université Paris 8 (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
5.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.