Media Mergers in Nested Markets

ABSTRACT We analyze the effect of media mergers in a model that stresses, on the one hand, the fact that media are two‐sided platforms willing to attract advertisers and viewers and, on the other hand, that strong competitors have emerged to challenge traditional media on both sides. We show that a merger has two conflicting effects on traditional media's incentives to invest in quality programs and to exploit their market power. When competition is primarily between traditional media, a Business‐Stealing Effect dominates, and the merger is detrimental to advertisers and viewers. When the competition is mainly between the traditional media and their new competitors, an Ecosystem Effect dominates, and the merger benefits advertisers and viewers. We extend this setting to discuss the role of financial constraints that might limit investments in the quality of programs and show that the same effects are at play.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12618
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Media Mergers in Nested Markets

David Martimort, Wilfried Sand‐Zantman
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Media Mergers in Nested Markets

David Martimort, Wilfried Sand‐Zantman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We analyze the effect of media mergers in a model that stresses, on the one hand, the fact that media are two‐sided platforms willing to attract advertisers and viewers and, on the other hand, that strong competitors have emerged to challenge traditional media on both sides. We show that a merger has two conflicting effects on traditional media's incentives to invest in quality programs and to exploit their market power. When competition is primarily between traditional media, a Business‐Stealing Effect dominates, and the merger is detrimental to advertisers and viewers. When the competition is mainly between the traditional media and their new competitors, an Ecosystem Effect dominates, and the merger benefits advertisers and viewers. We extend this setting to discuss the role of financial constraints that might limit investments in the quality of programs and show that the same effects are at play.

Journal of Economics & Management StrategyVol. 34(3)
École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR), Toulouse School of Economics (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Media Mergers in Nested Markets — David Martimort, Wilfried Sand‐Zantman · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS