Best practices for differential accessibility analysis in single-cell epigenomics

Differential accessibility (DA) analysis of single-cell epigenomics data enables the discovery of regulatory programs that establish cell type identity and steer responses to physiological and pathophysiological perturbations. While many statistical methods to identify DA regions have been developed, the principles that determine the performance of these methods remain unclear. As a result, there is no consensus on the most appropriate statistical methods for DA analysis of single-cell epigenomics data. Here, we present a systematic evaluation of statistical methods that have been applied to identify DA regions in single-cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) data. We leverage a compendium of scATAC-seq experiments with matching bulk ATAC-seq or scRNA-seq in order to assess the accuracy, bias, robustness, and scalability of each statistical method. The structure of our experiments also provides the opportunity to define best practices for the analysis of scATAC-seq data beyond DA itself. We leverage this understanding to develop an R package implementing these best practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53089-5
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best practices for differential accessibility analysis in single-cell epigenomics

Grégoire Courtine, Jordan W. Squair, Michael A. Skinnider, Alan Yue Yang Teo
8 citations
Nature Communications
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
1.87
article

Best practices for differential accessibility analysis in single-cell epigenomics

Grégoire Courtine, Jordan W. Squair, Michael A. Skinnider, Alan Yue Yang Teo
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Differential accessibility (DA) analysis of single-cell epigenomics data enables the discovery of regulatory programs that establish cell type identity and steer responses to physiological and pathophysiological perturbations. While many statistical methods to identify DA regions have been developed, the principles that determine the performance of these methods remain unclear. As a result, there is no consensus on the most appropriate statistical methods for DA analysis of single-cell epigenomics data. Here, we present a systematic evaluation of statistical methods that have been applied to identify DA regions in single-cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) data. We leverage a compendium of scATAC-seq experiments with matching bulk ATAC-seq or scRNA-seq in order to assess the accuracy, bias, robustness, and scalability of each statistical method. The structure of our experiments also provides the opportunity to define best practices for the analysis of scATAC-seq data beyond DA itself. We leverage this understanding to develop an R package implementing these best practices.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
Princeton University (US), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.