Model Bias Identification for Bayesian Calibration of Stochastic Digital Twins of Bridges

ABSTRACT Simulation‐based digital twins must provide accurate, robust, and reliable digital representations of their physical counterparts. Therefore, quantifying the uncertainty in their predictions plays a key role in making better‐informed decisions that impact the actual system. The update of the simulation model based on data must then be carefully implemented. When applied to complex structures such as bridges, discrepancies between the computational model and the real system appear as model bias, which hinders the trustworthiness of the digital twin and increases its uncertainty. Classical Bayesian updating approaches aimed at inferring the model parameters often fail to compensate for such model bias, leading to overconfident and unreliable predictions. In this paper, two alternative model bias identification approaches are evaluated in the context of their applicability to digital twins of bridges. A modularized version of Kennedy and O'Hagan's approach and another one based on Orthogonal Gaussian Processes are compared with the classical Bayesian inference framework in a set of representative benchmarks. Additionally, two novel extensions are proposed for these models: the inclusion of noise‐aware kernels and the introduction of additional variables not present in the computational model through the bias term. The integration of these approaches into the digital twin corrects the predictions, quantifies their uncertainty, estimates noise from unknown physical sources of error, and provides further insight into the system by including additional pre‐existing information without modifying the computational model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2897
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Bias Identification for Bayesian Calibration of Stochastic Digital Twins of Bridges

Daniel Andrés Arcones, Phaedon‐Stelios Koutsourelakis, Jörg F. Unger, Martin Weiser
1 citations
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
0.26
article

Model Bias Identification for Bayesian Calibration of Stochastic Digital Twins of Bridges

Daniel Andrés Arcones, Phaedon‐Stelios Koutsourelakis, Jörg F. Unger, Martin Weiser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Simulation‐based digital twins must provide accurate, robust, and reliable digital representations of their physical counterparts. Therefore, quantifying the uncertainty in their predictions plays a key role in making better‐informed decisions that impact the actual system. The update of the simulation model based on data must then be carefully implemented. When applied to complex structures such as bridges, discrepancies between the computational model and the real system appear as model bias, which hinders the trustworthiness of the digital twin and increases its uncertainty. Classical Bayesian updating approaches aimed at inferring the model parameters often fail to compensate for such model bias, leading to overconfident and unreliable predictions. In this paper, two alternative model bias identification approaches are evaluated in the context of their applicability to digital twins of bridges. A modularized version of Kennedy and O'Hagan's approach and another one based on Orthogonal Gaussian Processes are compared with the classical Bayesian inference framework in a set of representative benchmarks. Additionally, two novel extensions are proposed for these models: the inclusion of noise‐aware kernels and the introduction of additional variables not present in the computational model through the bias term. The integration of these approaches into the digital twin corrects the predictions, quantifies their uncertainty, estimates noise from unknown physical sources of error, and provides further insight into the system by including additional pre‐existing information without modifying the computational model.

Applied Stochastic Models in Business and IndustryVol. 41(3)
Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing (DE), Zuse Institute Berlin (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
0.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.