Competence in digital forensics

Those practising in the field of digital forensics must be competent to conduct the work they carry out, and such competence must also be evidenced and assessed. Those seeking to demonstrate staff competence must consider what tasks and roles it is being sought for, how it is achieved, what is an acceptable level of performance for a task, and how to evidence and assess any claimed competence. This work intends to explore the multifaceted nature of competence within the field of digital forensics, examining how it is developed, assessed, and maintained in an era characterised by continuous technological advancement. Discussions are also linked to the requirements defined in the accreditation framework ISO/IEC 17025:2017 which governs the digital forensic landscape in England and Wales. We hope to contribute to the ongoing discourse on elevating standards and fostering excellence in the science of digital forensics. • A discussion of competence in relation to digital forensics is offered. • The elements that competence comprises of are set out and described. • The impact of ISO/IEC17025:2017 on the need to evidence and assess competence is examined. • There are no conflicts to decalre.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301840
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competence in digital forensics

Graeme Horsman, Andrew Dodd
1 citations
Forensic Science International Digital Investigation
Digital and Cyber Forensics
0.78
article

Competence in digital forensics

Graeme Horsman, Andrew Dodd
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Those practising in the field of digital forensics must be competent to conduct the work they carry out, and such competence must also be evidenced and assessed. Those seeking to demonstrate staff competence must consider what tasks and roles it is being sought for, how it is achieved, what is an acceptable level of performance for a task, and how to evidence and assess any claimed competence. This work intends to explore the multifaceted nature of competence within the field of digital forensics, examining how it is developed, assessed, and maintained in an era characterised by continuous technological advancement. Discussions are also linked to the requirements defined in the accreditation framework ISO/IEC 17025:2017 which governs the digital forensic landscape in England and Wales. We hope to contribute to the ongoing discourse on elevating standards and fostering excellence in the science of digital forensics. • A discussion of competence in relation to digital forensics is offered. • The elements that competence comprises of are set out and described. • The impact of ISO/IEC17025:2017 on the need to evidence and assess competence is examined. • There are no conflicts to decalre.

Forensic Science International Digital InvestigationVol. 51
Agricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom) (GB), Cranfield University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Competence in digital forensics — Graeme Horsman, Andrew Dodd · Forensic Science International Digital Investigation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS