When affective commitment leads to viability: The role of trust as a mediator and virtuality as a moderator

This study investigates the relationship between affective commitment and team viability, considering team cognitive and affective trust as mediators and the team’s level of virtuality as a moderator. A survey-based study was conducted with 177 Portuguese work teams from several companies, and hypotheses were tested through partial least structure equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Our results reveal no statistical evidence of a direct positive association between affective commitment and viability but a significant indirect relationship through cognitive trust. This result highlights the critical role of cognitive trust in promoting viability. Moreover, our findings reveal that virtuality negatively moderates the relationship between affective trust and viability. Although affective trust is positive for viability when virtuality is low, it becomes detrimental when teams present high levels of virtuality. For practice, our results suggest the importance of promoting cognitive trust among teams and the need to be mindful regarding the level of virtuality because it may impact how trust influences team outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Management Journal
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.10.005
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When affective commitment leads to viability: The role of trust as a mediator and virtuality as a moderator

Teresa Rebelo, Isabel Dórdio Dimas, Marta Pereira Alves, Paulo Renato Lourenço et al.
5 citations
European Management Journal
Team Dynamics and Performance
3.22
article

When affective commitment leads to viability: The role of trust as a mediator and virtuality as a moderator

Teresa Rebelo, Isabel Dórdio Dimas, Marta Pereira Alves, Paulo Renato Lourenço, Karma Lhaden
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between affective commitment and team viability, considering team cognitive and affective trust as mediators and the team’s level of virtuality as a moderator. A survey-based study was conducted with 177 Portuguese work teams from several companies, and hypotheses were tested through partial least structure equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Our results reveal no statistical evidence of a direct positive association between affective commitment and viability but a significant indirect relationship through cognitive trust. This result highlights the critical role of cognitive trust in promoting viability. Moreover, our findings reveal that virtuality negatively moderates the relationship between affective trust and viability. Although affective trust is positive for viability when virtuality is low, it becomes detrimental when teams present high levels of virtuality. For practice, our results suggest the importance of promoting cognitive trust among teams and the need to be mindful regarding the level of virtuality because it may impact how trust influences team outcomes.

European Management JournalVol. 43(6)
University of Beira Interior (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Team Dynamics and Performance
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When affective commitment leads to viability: The role of trust as a mediator and virtuality as a moderator — Teresa Rebelo, Isabel Dórdio Dimas, et al. · European Management Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS