Low-cost fabrication methods of ZnO nanorods and their physical and photoelectrochemical properties for optoelectronic applications

Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanorods have great potential in several applications including gas sensors, light-emitting diodes, and solar cells because of their unique properties. Here, three low cost and ecofriendly techniques were used to produce ZnO nanorods on FTO substrates: hydrothermal, chemical bath deposition (CBD), and electrochemical deposition (ECD). This study explores the impact of such methods on the optical, structural, electrical, morphological, and photoelectrochemical properties of nanorods using various measurements. XRD analysis confirmed the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO nanorods in all three methods, with hydrothermal showing a preferred orientation (002) and CBD and ECD samples showing multiple growth directions, with average particle sizes of 31 nm, 34 nm, and 33 nm, respectively. Raman spectra revealed hexagonal Wurtzite structure of ZnO, with hydrothermal method exhibiting higher E<sub>2</sub> (high) peak at 438 cm<sup>-1</sup> than CBD and ECD methods. SEM results revealed hexagonal ZnO nanorods became more regular and thicker for the hydrothermal method, while CBD and ECD led to less uniform with voids. UV-vis spectra showed absorption lines between 390 nm and 360 nm. Optical bandgap energies were calculated as 3.32 eV, 3.22 eV, and 3.23 eV for hydrothermal, CBD, and ECD samples, respectively. PL spectra revealed UV emission band with a small intensity peak around 389 nm and visible emission peaks at 580 nm. Temperature dependent PL measurements for ZnO nanorods indicated that the intensities ratio between bound exciton and free exciton decreases with temperature increases for the three methods. Photocurrent measurements revealed ZnO nanorod films as n-type semiconductors, with photocurrent values of 2.25 µA, 0.28 µA, and 0.3 µA for hydrothermal, CBD, and ECD samples, and photosensitivity values of 8.01, 2.79, and 3.56 respectively. Our results suggest that the hydrothermal method is the most effective approach for fabricating high-quality ZnO nanorods for optoelectronic applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73352-5
Citations
42
Primary Topic
ZnO doping and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-cost fabrication methods of ZnO nanorods and their physical and photoelectrochemical properties for optoelectronic applications

Abdelhamid El‐Shaer, Mahmoud Abdelfatah, Walid Ismail, Mabrouk Bakry
42 citations
Scientific Reports
ZnO doping and properties
4.92
article

Low-cost fabrication methods of ZnO nanorods and their physical and photoelectrochemical properties for optoelectronic applications

Abdelhamid El‐Shaer, Mahmoud Abdelfatah, Walid Ismail, Mabrouk Bakry
article en
42 citations

Abstract

Zinc Oxide (ZnO) nanorods have great potential in several applications including gas sensors, light-emitting diodes, and solar cells because of their unique properties. Here, three low cost and ecofriendly techniques were used to produce ZnO nanorods on FTO substrates: hydrothermal, chemical bath deposition (CBD), and electrochemical deposition (ECD). This study explores the impact of such methods on the optical, structural, electrical, morphological, and photoelectrochemical properties of nanorods using various measurements. XRD analysis confirmed the hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO nanorods in all three methods, with hydrothermal showing a preferred orientation (002) and CBD and ECD samples showing multiple growth directions, with average particle sizes of 31 nm, 34 nm, and 33 nm, respectively. Raman spectra revealed hexagonal Wurtzite structure of ZnO, with hydrothermal method exhibiting higher E<sub>2</sub> (high) peak at 438 cm<sup>-1</sup> than CBD and ECD methods. SEM results revealed hexagonal ZnO nanorods became more regular and thicker for the hydrothermal method, while CBD and ECD led to less uniform with voids. UV-vis spectra showed absorption lines between 390 nm and 360 nm. Optical bandgap energies were calculated as 3.32 eV, 3.22 eV, and 3.23 eV for hydrothermal, CBD, and ECD samples, respectively. PL spectra revealed UV emission band with a small intensity peak around 389 nm and visible emission peaks at 580 nm. Temperature dependent PL measurements for ZnO nanorods indicated that the intensities ratio between bound exciton and free exciton decreases with temperature increases for the three methods. Photocurrent measurements revealed ZnO nanorod films as n-type semiconductors, with photocurrent values of 2.25 µA, 0.28 µA, and 0.3 µA for hydrothermal, CBD, and ECD samples, and photosensitivity values of 8.01, 2.79, and 3.56 respectively. Our results suggest that the hydrothermal method is the most effective approach for fabricating high-quality ZnO nanorods for optoelectronic applications.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
Science and Technology Development Fund
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
ZnO doping and properties
4.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.