Reproductive toxicology: keeping up with our changing world

Reproductive toxicology testing is essential to safeguard public health of current and future generations. Traditional toxicological testing of male reproduction has focused on evaluating substances for acute toxicity to the reproductive system, with fertility assessment as a main endpoint and infertility a main adverse outcome. Newer studies in the last few decades have significantly widened our understanding of what represents an adverse event in reproductive toxicology, and thus changed our perspective of what constitutes a reproductive toxicant, such as endocrine disrupting chemicals that affect fertility and offspring health in an intergenerational manner. Besides infertility or congenital abnormalities, adverse outcomes can present as increased likelihood for various health problems in offspring, including metabolic syndrome, neurodevelopmental problems like autism and increased cancer predisposition, among others. To enable toxicologic studies to accurately represent the population, toxicologic testing designs need to model changing population characteristics and exposure circumstances. Current trends of increasing importance in human reproduction include increased paternal age, with an associated decline of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), and a higher prevalence of obesity, both of which are factors that toxicological testing study design should account for. In this perspective article, we highlighted some limitations of standard testing protocols, the need for expanding the assessed reproductive endpoint by including genetic and epigenetic sperm parameters, and the potential of recent developments, including mixture testing, novel animal models, <i>in vitro</i> systems like organoids, multigenerational testing protocols, as well as <i>in silico</i> modelling, machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Toxicology
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2024.1456687
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive toxicology: keeping up with our changing world

Mirella L. Meyer‐Ficca, Ralph G. Meyer, Morgan B. Feuz, Laura B. Miller
1 citations
Frontiers in Toxicology
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
0.31
article

Reproductive toxicology: keeping up with our changing world

Mirella L. Meyer‐Ficca, Ralph G. Meyer, Morgan B. Feuz, Laura B. Miller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reproductive toxicology testing is essential to safeguard public health of current and future generations. Traditional toxicological testing of male reproduction has focused on evaluating substances for acute toxicity to the reproductive system, with fertility assessment as a main endpoint and infertility a main adverse outcome. Newer studies in the last few decades have significantly widened our understanding of what represents an adverse event in reproductive toxicology, and thus changed our perspective of what constitutes a reproductive toxicant, such as endocrine disrupting chemicals that affect fertility and offspring health in an intergenerational manner. Besides infertility or congenital abnormalities, adverse outcomes can present as increased likelihood for various health problems in offspring, including metabolic syndrome, neurodevelopmental problems like autism and increased cancer predisposition, among others. To enable toxicologic studies to accurately represent the population, toxicologic testing designs need to model changing population characteristics and exposure circumstances. Current trends of increasing importance in human reproduction include increased paternal age, with an associated decline of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), and a higher prevalence of obesity, both of which are factors that toxicological testing study design should account for. In this perspective article, we highlighted some limitations of standard testing protocols, the need for expanding the assessed reproductive endpoint by including genetic and epigenetic sperm parameters, and the potential of recent developments, including mixture testing, novel animal models, <i>in vitro</i> systems like organoids, multigenerational testing protocols, as well as <i>in silico</i> modelling, machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Frontiers in ToxicologyVol. 6
Utah State University (US)
Utah State University, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
0.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.