Behavior of GFRP Reinforced-Concrete Bubbled One-Way Slabs by Encased Composite Steel I-Sections

Bubbled Reinforced Concrete (RC) slabs have gained popularity in recent years as a practical construction method that eliminates unnecessary concrete in the center, thereby reducing the dead weight of the structure. This study provides a systematic framework to compare the performance and capabilities of one-way bubbled concrete slabs reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars and embedded steel I-sections. Four one-way concrete slabs, each with a length of 2,600 mm and a rectangular cross-sectional area of 600 mm in width and 150 mm in depth were employed. These slabs were reinforced with Glass Reinforced Plastics (GRP) rebar at the same reinforcement ratio and tested by two-point bending to failure. Different parameters such as specimen type (solid or bubbled slabs) and internal reinforcement were achieved using steel I-sections in two different shapes (2 and 4 pcs of steel I-sections), where 4I-section shape with a cross-sectional area equivalent to 2I-section shape, channel shear connectors, and bent steel bars (10 mm diameter) were used to improve the shear resistance. The results showed that bubbled slabs experienced a higher range of deformations (including deflection, strains, and cracks) by about (28%-88%) and a 15% decrease in ultimate load capacity compared to solid slabs. On the other hand, the use of steel I-sections as internal reinforcement significantly improved the specimen performance compared to unreinforced slabs (Steel Slab (SS) and Bubbled Slab (BS), respectively). Deflection was reduced by approximately 52% and 87% at the same load level, ultimate load capacity increased by approximately 121% and 179%, and flexural stiffness increased by approximately 197% and 272% at the same load level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8123
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavior of GFRP Reinforced-Concrete Bubbled One-Way Slabs by Encased Composite Steel I-Sections

Ali Hussein Ali Al‐Ahmed, Mohannad Abdulkhaliq
5 citations
Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
1.33
article

Behavior of GFRP Reinforced-Concrete Bubbled One-Way Slabs by Encased Composite Steel I-Sections

Ali Hussein Ali Al‐Ahmed, Mohannad Abdulkhaliq
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Bubbled Reinforced Concrete (RC) slabs have gained popularity in recent years as a practical construction method that eliminates unnecessary concrete in the center, thereby reducing the dead weight of the structure. This study provides a systematic framework to compare the performance and capabilities of one-way bubbled concrete slabs reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars and embedded steel I-sections. Four one-way concrete slabs, each with a length of 2,600 mm and a rectangular cross-sectional area of 600 mm in width and 150 mm in depth were employed. These slabs were reinforced with Glass Reinforced Plastics (GRP) rebar at the same reinforcement ratio and tested by two-point bending to failure. Different parameters such as specimen type (solid or bubbled slabs) and internal reinforcement were achieved using steel I-sections in two different shapes (2 and 4 pcs of steel I-sections), where 4I-section shape with a cross-sectional area equivalent to 2I-section shape, channel shear connectors, and bent steel bars (10 mm diameter) were used to improve the shear resistance. The results showed that bubbled slabs experienced a higher range of deformations (including deflection, strains, and cracks) by about (28%-88%) and a 15% decrease in ultimate load capacity compared to solid slabs. On the other hand, the use of steel I-sections as internal reinforcement significantly improved the specimen performance compared to unreinforced slabs (Steel Slab (SS) and Bubbled Slab (BS), respectively). Deflection was reduced by approximately 52% and 87% at the same load level, ultimate load capacity increased by approximately 121% and 179%, and flexural stiffness increased by approximately 197% and 272% at the same load level.

Engineering Technology & Applied Science ResearchVol. 14(5)
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.