Pre-peak Emission in Tidal Disruption Events

Abstract The rising part of a tidal disruption event light curve provides unique insight into early emission and the onset of accretion. Various mechanisms are proposed to explain the pre-peak emission, including shocks from debris interaction and reprocessing of disk emission. We study the pre-peak emission and its influence on the gas circularization by a series of gray radiation hydrodynamic simulations with varying black hole mass. We find that, given a super-Eddington fallback rate of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>̇</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Edd</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , the stream–stream collision can occur multiple times and drive strong outflows of up to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>̇</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Edd</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> . By dispersing gas to ≳100 r s , the outflow can delay gas circularization and leads to sub-Eddington accretion rates during the first few stream–stream collisions. The stream–stream collision shock and circularization shock can sustain a luminosity of ∼10 44 erg s −1 for days. The luminosity is generally sub-Eddington and shows a weak correlation with accretion rate at early times. The outflow is optically thick, yielding a reprocessing layer with a size of ∼10 14 cm and photospheric temperature of ∼4 × 10 4 K.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c39
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-peak Emission in Tidal Disruption Events

Xiaoshan Huang, Yan-Fei Jiang, Shane W. Davis
12 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
3.98
article

Pre-peak Emission in Tidal Disruption Events

Xiaoshan Huang, Yan-Fei Jiang, Shane W. Davis
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract The rising part of a tidal disruption event light curve provides unique insight into early emission and the onset of accretion. Various mechanisms are proposed to explain the pre-peak emission, including shocks from debris interaction and reprocessing of disk emission. We study the pre-peak emission and its influence on the gas circularization by a series of gray radiation hydrodynamic simulations with varying black hole mass. We find that, given a super-Eddington fallback rate of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>̇</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Edd</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , the stream–stream collision can occur multiple times and drive strong outflows of up to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>̇</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Edd</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> . By dispersing gas to ≳100 r s , the outflow can delay gas circularization and leads to sub-Eddington accretion rates during the first few stream–stream collisions. The stream–stream collision shock and circularization shock can sustain a luminosity of ∼10 44 erg s −1 for days. The luminosity is generally sub-Eddington and shows a weak correlation with accretion rate at early times. The outflow is optically thick, yielding a reprocessing layer with a size of ∼10 14 cm and photospheric temperature of ∼4 × 10 4 K.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 974(2)
University of Virginia (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology, Johns Hopkins University, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Ames Research Center, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
3.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.