The Independence of Arbitration Clause from the Contract

The independence of the arbitration clause from the main contract is widely recognized in arbitration, so this study aims to discuss the legal issues that constitute the justification so that the arbitration clause does not become canceled even if the main contract is canceled. Thus, the arbitration clause is distinguished from other contracts as it is regarded as an autonomous contract dependent on the main contract; this study has shown that Jordanian arbitration law (2010), international legislation, international agreements, and judicial rulings established and adopted the legal precept that the arbitration clause is separate and apart from the main contract and any ancillary contracts. Consequently, the arbitration clause is a valid and independent condition concerning the principle of autonomy of the will. Significant results arose from that, among which that the arbitration clause enjoys legal independence and that the fate of the arbitration clause is not linked to the fate of the main contract, whether its invalidity, annulment, or termination, so that its invalidity does not lead to the invalidity of the main contract and no defect in a contract should entail of itself the invalidity of the arbitration clause. In the case of coercion, which necessarily lays on the personality of the other contracting party and aims to intimidate him and influence his will, the coercion that nullifies the main contract necessarily leads to the annulment of the arbitration clause, and therefore this is considered a departure from the principle of independence unless the arbitration clause has been agreed upon after the conclusion of the main contract and after the cessation of the coercion. Finally, the study employs descriptive and analytical approaches to reach its purposes. In conclusion, it opens the door to appeal against arbitral awards by requesting reconsideration and appeal against arbitral awards because of the violation of the law and the error in its application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v16i3.823
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Independence of Arbitration Clause from the Contract

Muhanned Al taani
The Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

The Independence of Arbitration Clause from the Contract

Muhanned Al taani
article en

Abstract

The independence of the arbitration clause from the main contract is widely recognized in arbitration, so this study aims to discuss the legal issues that constitute the justification so that the arbitration clause does not become canceled even if the main contract is canceled. Thus, the arbitration clause is distinguished from other contracts as it is regarded as an autonomous contract dependent on the main contract; this study has shown that Jordanian arbitration law (2010), international legislation, international agreements, and judicial rulings established and adopted the legal precept that the arbitration clause is separate and apart from the main contract and any ancillary contracts. Consequently, the arbitration clause is a valid and independent condition concerning the principle of autonomy of the will. Significant results arose from that, among which that the arbitration clause enjoys legal independence and that the fate of the arbitration clause is not linked to the fate of the main contract, whether its invalidity, annulment, or termination, so that its invalidity does not lead to the invalidity of the main contract and no defect in a contract should entail of itself the invalidity of the arbitration clause. In the case of coercion, which necessarily lays on the personality of the other contracting party and aims to intimidate him and influence his will, the coercion that nullifies the main contract necessarily leads to the annulment of the arbitration clause, and therefore this is considered a departure from the principle of independence unless the arbitration clause has been agreed upon after the conclusion of the main contract and after the cessation of the coercion. Finally, the study employs descriptive and analytical approaches to reach its purposes. In conclusion, it opens the door to appeal against arbitral awards by requesting reconsideration and appeal against arbitral awards because of the violation of the law and the error in its application.

The Jordanian Journal of Law and Political ScienceVol. 16(3)
University of Jordan (JO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.