Elite germplasm introduction, training set composition, and genetic optimization algorithms effect on genomic selection‐based breeding programs

Abstract In genomic selection (GS), the prediction accuracy is heavily influenced by the composition of the training set (TS). Currently, two primary strategies for building TS are used: one involves accumulating historical phenotypic records from multiple years, while the other is the “test‐and‐shelf” approach. Additionally, studies have suggested that optimizing TS composition using genetic algorithms can improve the accuracy of prediction models. Most breeders operate in open systems, introducing new genetic variability into their populations as needed. However, the impact of elite germplasm introduction in GS models remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a case study in self‐pollinated crops using stochastic simulations to understand the effects of elite germplasm introduction, TS composition, and its optimization in long‐term breeding programs. Overall, introducing external elite germplasm reduces the prediction accuracy. In this context, test and shelf seem more stable regarding accuracy in dealing with introductions despite the origin and rate, being useful in programs where the introductions come from different sources over the years. Conversely, using historical data, if the introductions come from the same source over the cycles, this negative effect is reduced as long as the cycles and this approach become the best. Thus, it may support public breeding programs in establishing networks of collaborations where the exchange of germplasm will occur at a predefined rate and flow. In either case, the use of algorithms of optimization to trim the genetic variability does not bring a substantial advantage in the medium to long term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Science
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21384
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elite germplasm introduction, training set composition, and genetic optimization algorithms effect on genomic selection‐based breeding programs

Allison Vieira da Silva, Roberto Fritsche‐Neto, Júlio César DoVale, Melina Prado et al.
3 citations
Crop Science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
1.65
article

Elite germplasm introduction, training set composition, and genetic optimization algorithms effect on genomic selection‐based breeding programs

Allison Vieira da Silva, Roberto Fritsche‐Neto, Júlio César DoVale, Melina Prado, Rafael Massahiro Yassue
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In genomic selection (GS), the prediction accuracy is heavily influenced by the composition of the training set (TS). Currently, two primary strategies for building TS are used: one involves accumulating historical phenotypic records from multiple years, while the other is the “test‐and‐shelf” approach. Additionally, studies have suggested that optimizing TS composition using genetic algorithms can improve the accuracy of prediction models. Most breeders operate in open systems, introducing new genetic variability into their populations as needed. However, the impact of elite germplasm introduction in GS models remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a case study in self‐pollinated crops using stochastic simulations to understand the effects of elite germplasm introduction, TS composition, and its optimization in long‐term breeding programs. Overall, introducing external elite germplasm reduces the prediction accuracy. In this context, test and shelf seem more stable regarding accuracy in dealing with introductions despite the origin and rate, being useful in programs where the introductions come from different sources over the years. Conversely, using historical data, if the introductions come from the same source over the cycles, this negative effect is reduced as long as the cycles and this approach become the best. Thus, it may support public breeding programs in establishing networks of collaborations where the exchange of germplasm will occur at a predefined rate and flow. In either case, the use of algorithms of optimization to trim the genetic variability does not bring a substantial advantage in the medium to long term.

Crop ScienceVol. 64(6)
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
1.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.