Clinically Relevant Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac Imaging: Insights from the European MR/CT Registry

Purpose To determine the prevalence of clinically relevant extracardiac findings at cardiac CT and MRI examinations from a multicenter, multinational MR/CT registry and the relationship of prevalence with examination indications and patient characteristics. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective analysis of data from the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology MR/CT Registry. Data from 208 506 cardiac CT examinations (median patient age, 66 years [IQR, 55-77]; 121 617 [58.33%] male patients) and 228 462 cardiac MRI examinations (median patient age, 57 years [IQR, 42-69]; 145 792 [63.81%] male patients) entered into the registry between January 2011 and November 2023 were analyzed. Clinically relevant extracardiac findings were defined as findings requiring follow-up examinations or influencing clinical management. The association of examination indication and patient characteristics, including age, with prevalence of extracardiac findings was evaluated using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) derived from multivariable Poisson regression models. Results The prevalence of clinically relevant extracardiac findings was 3.28% (6832 of 208 506) at cardiac CT and 1.50% (3421 of 228 462) at cardiac MRI examinations. Extracardiac findings were more common at CT examinations performed for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (IRR, 2.07; <i>P</i> < .001) and structural heart disease (IRR, 1.44; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with CT performed for coronary artery disease (IRR, 1; reference). Extracardiac findings were more common at MRI examinations performed for myocarditis (IRR, 1.36; <i>P</i> < .001) and structural heart disease (IRR, 1.16; <i>P</i> < .001) than for coronary artery disease. Older patient age was also significantly associated with higher prevalence of extracardiac findings, with an IRR for both CT and MRI examinations of 1.02 (<i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion Data from the multicenter, multinational MR/CT registry indicate that clinically relevant extracardiac findings are present at cardiovascular CT and MRI examinations, and the prevalence of these findings is associated with examination indication and patient age. <b>Keywords:</b> Cardiac Imaging Techniques, Incidental Findings, MRI, CT Angiography, CT, Heart Disease <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.240117
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinically Relevant Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac Imaging: Insights from the European MR/CT Registry

Matthias Eberhard, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Konstantin Nikolaou, Christian Loewe et al.
8 citations
Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
3.23
article

Clinically Relevant Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac Imaging: Insights from the European MR/CT Registry

Matthias Eberhard, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Konstantin Nikolaou, Christian Loewe, Christian Lücke, Ricardo P.J. Budde, Michelle C. Williams, Luigi Natale, Marco Francone, Robin F. Gohmann, Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Maja Hrabak Paar, Matthias Gutberlet, Hatem Alkadhi, Maja Pirnat, Rodrigo Salgado, Lukas J. Moser
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Purpose To determine the prevalence of clinically relevant extracardiac findings at cardiac CT and MRI examinations from a multicenter, multinational MR/CT registry and the relationship of prevalence with examination indications and patient characteristics. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective analysis of data from the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology MR/CT Registry. Data from 208 506 cardiac CT examinations (median patient age, 66 years [IQR, 55-77]; 121 617 [58.33%] male patients) and 228 462 cardiac MRI examinations (median patient age, 57 years [IQR, 42-69]; 145 792 [63.81%] male patients) entered into the registry between January 2011 and November 2023 were analyzed. Clinically relevant extracardiac findings were defined as findings requiring follow-up examinations or influencing clinical management. The association of examination indication and patient characteristics, including age, with prevalence of extracardiac findings was evaluated using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) derived from multivariable Poisson regression models. Results The prevalence of clinically relevant extracardiac findings was 3.28% (6832 of 208 506) at cardiac CT and 1.50% (3421 of 228 462) at cardiac MRI examinations. Extracardiac findings were more common at CT examinations performed for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (IRR, 2.07; <i>P</i> < .001) and structural heart disease (IRR, 1.44; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with CT performed for coronary artery disease (IRR, 1; reference). Extracardiac findings were more common at MRI examinations performed for myocarditis (IRR, 1.36; <i>P</i> < .001) and structural heart disease (IRR, 1.16; <i>P</i> < .001) than for coronary artery disease. Older patient age was also significantly associated with higher prevalence of extracardiac findings, with an IRR for both CT and MRI examinations of 1.02 (<i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion Data from the multicenter, multinational MR/CT registry indicate that clinically relevant extracardiac findings are present at cardiovascular CT and MRI examinations, and the prevalence of these findings is associated with examination indication and patient age. <b>Keywords:</b> Cardiac Imaging Techniques, Incidental Findings, MRI, CT Angiography, CT, Heart Disease <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2024.

Radiology Cardiothoracic ImagingVol. 6(5)
University of Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
3.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.