Validating a novel genetic technology for hybrid maize seed production under management practices associated with resource‐poor farmers in Zimbabwe

Societal Impact Statement A hybrid maize seed production technology has the potential to reduce the complexity of hybrid seed production and increase seed quality. Here, we investigate the potential impact of this technology on yields when hybrid maize is recycled. Hybrid maize recycling is a practice used by resource‐poor farmers as a coping mechanism during drought years. Recycling hybrid maize produced using this technology could provide a small yet significant yield benefit to resource‐poor farmers when they chose to recycle. This study provides an example of how social considerations can be incorporated into testing strategies of new technologies to ensure equitable benefits. Summary Understanding the performance of new genetic technologies in farmers' real‐world realities, especially those relevant to resource‐poor farmers, is often overlooked but is essential to ensure equitable benefits. A new genetic technology was developed to simplify hybrid maize seed production in sub‐Saharan Africa, thereby improving farmers' access to high‐quality hybrid seed. Hybrids produced with this technology segregate 50:50 for pollen‐producing and non‐pollen producing and are designated 50% non‐pollen producing (FNP). FNP maize has higher yields in low‐input environments. As recycling hybrid maize seed remains a common practice in Zimbabwe, including among resource‐poor households, it is important to understand the impact of recycling FNP seed on the yield gains from the FNP technology. The potential impact of recycling FNP hybrid seed was assessed by testing three seed recycling scenarios on‐station and on‐farm. The extent of hybrid seed recycling and the types of households recycling hybrid maize seed over a 3‐year period were also investigated. Hybrid maize seed recycling was associated with resource‐poor farmers, although it was not continually practiced across years. Yield gains associated with FNP were retained under recycling practices, albeit reduced. The greatest yield benefit was when seed from only non‐pollen‐producing plants was used. Yield gains were associated with longer ears and more kernels per ear. While recycling hybrid maize seed reduces potential yields due to inbreeding depression, in the years when farmers cannot afford to plant hybrid maize only, recycling non‐pollen‐producing hybrid maize seed conferred a yield benefit of 116 kg ha −1 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants People Planet
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10590
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating a novel genetic technology for hybrid maize seed production under management practices associated with resource‐poor farmers in Zimbabwe

Frédéric Baudron, Sarah Collinson, Mainassara Zaman‐Allah, Jill E. Cairns et al.
6 citations
Plants People Planet
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
8.05
article

Validating a novel genetic technology for hybrid maize seed production under management practices associated with resource‐poor farmers in Zimbabwe

Frédéric Baudron, Sarah Collinson, Mainassara Zaman‐Allah, Jill E. Cairns, Angelinus Cornelius Franke, Maryke Tine Labuschagne, Juan A. Burgueño, Esnath Hamadziripi, Rachel C. Voss, M. Olsen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Societal Impact Statement A hybrid maize seed production technology has the potential to reduce the complexity of hybrid seed production and increase seed quality. Here, we investigate the potential impact of this technology on yields when hybrid maize is recycled. Hybrid maize recycling is a practice used by resource‐poor farmers as a coping mechanism during drought years. Recycling hybrid maize produced using this technology could provide a small yet significant yield benefit to resource‐poor farmers when they chose to recycle. This study provides an example of how social considerations can be incorporated into testing strategies of new technologies to ensure equitable benefits. Summary Understanding the performance of new genetic technologies in farmers' real‐world realities, especially those relevant to resource‐poor farmers, is often overlooked but is essential to ensure equitable benefits. A new genetic technology was developed to simplify hybrid maize seed production in sub‐Saharan Africa, thereby improving farmers' access to high‐quality hybrid seed. Hybrids produced with this technology segregate 50:50 for pollen‐producing and non‐pollen producing and are designated 50% non‐pollen producing (FNP). FNP maize has higher yields in low‐input environments. As recycling hybrid maize seed remains a common practice in Zimbabwe, including among resource‐poor households, it is important to understand the impact of recycling FNP seed on the yield gains from the FNP technology. The potential impact of recycling FNP hybrid seed was assessed by testing three seed recycling scenarios on‐station and on‐farm. The extent of hybrid seed recycling and the types of households recycling hybrid maize seed over a 3‐year period were also investigated. Hybrid maize seed recycling was associated with resource‐poor farmers, although it was not continually practiced across years. Yield gains associated with FNP were retained under recycling practices, albeit reduced. The greatest yield benefit was when seed from only non‐pollen‐producing plants was used. Yield gains were associated with longer ears and more kernels per ear. While recycling hybrid maize seed reduces potential yields due to inbreeding depression, in the years when farmers cannot afford to plant hybrid maize only, recycling non‐pollen‐producing hybrid maize seed conferred a yield benefit of 116 kg ha −1 .

Plants People PlanetVol. 7(3)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX), University of the Free State (ZA), Corteva (United States) (US), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (KE), Agro-écologie et intensification durable des cultures annuelles
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
8.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.