Allied health work readiness capabilities: a qualitative comparison of graduates, supervisors, and managers’ perspectives

Researchers have highlighted gaps in the work readiness (WR) of allied health (AH) graduates and the capabilities required to successfully work in an interprofessional collaborative practice healthcare environment. In the studies conducted, the focus has generally been on one AH discipline or on one participant group across disciplines, such as new graduates. We explored WR capability of new AH graduates across three participant groups (managers, supervisors, and graduates) and across several AH disciplines in the health sector. Focus groups using Critical Incident Technique (CIT) were conducted with 47 participants (14 new graduates, 13 supervisors, and 20 managers) from four public health organisations across Eastern Australia. CIT identified examples where new AH graduates had/did not have necessary WR capabilities to manage situations in the collaborative practice environment. Using thematic analysis, we found four main themes related to WR expectations of AH graduates (work skills and knowledge, working with others, personal attributes, and organisational knowledge), with several sub-themes. Some aspects of identified themes/sub-themes were unique to the AH interprofessional work context. Understanding of AH graduates' WR from multiple perspectives could support development of programs to enable graduate success in interprofessional working environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2406476
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allied health work readiness capabilities: a qualitative comparison of graduates, supervisors, and managers’ perspectives

Lindy McAllister, Srivalli Nagarajan, Arlene Walker, Rachel A. Elphinston et al.
2 citations
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Global Health Workforce Issues
1.49
article

Allied health work readiness capabilities: a qualitative comparison of graduates, supervisors, and managers’ perspectives

Lindy McAllister, Srivalli Nagarajan, Arlene Walker, Rachel A. Elphinston, Poppy Orr, Michael Dunne
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Researchers have highlighted gaps in the work readiness (WR) of allied health (AH) graduates and the capabilities required to successfully work in an interprofessional collaborative practice healthcare environment. In the studies conducted, the focus has generally been on one AH discipline or on one participant group across disciplines, such as new graduates. We explored WR capability of new AH graduates across three participant groups (managers, supervisors, and graduates) and across several AH disciplines in the health sector. Focus groups using Critical Incident Technique (CIT) were conducted with 47 participants (14 new graduates, 13 supervisors, and 20 managers) from four public health organisations across Eastern Australia. CIT identified examples where new AH graduates had/did not have necessary WR capabilities to manage situations in the collaborative practice environment. Using thematic analysis, we found four main themes related to WR expectations of AH graduates (work skills and knowledge, working with others, personal attributes, and organisational knowledge), with several sub-themes. Some aspects of identified themes/sub-themes were unique to the AH interprofessional work context. Understanding of AH graduates' WR from multiple perspectives could support development of programs to enable graduate success in interprofessional working environments.

Journal of Interprofessional CareVol. 38(6)
The University of Sydney (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Queensland Health, ACT Health, NSW Ministry of Health, Barwon Health Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Global Health Workforce Issues
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.