Balancing Privacy and Accuracy Using Significant Gradient Protection in Federated Learning

Previous state-of-the-art studies have demonstrated that adversaries can access sensitive user data by membership inference attacks (MIAs) in Federated Learning (FL). Introducing differential privacy (DP) into the FL framework is an effective way to enhance the privacy of FL. Nevertheless, in differentially private federated learning (DP-FL), local gradients become excessively sparse in certain training rounds. Especially when training with low privacy budgets, there is a risk of introducing excessive noise into clients’ gradients. This issue can lead to a significant degradation in the accuracy of the global model. Thus, how to balance the user's privacy and global model accuracy becomes a challenge in DP-FL. To this end, we propose an approach, known as differential privacy federated aggregation, based on significant gradient protection (DP-FedASGP). DP-FedASGP can mitigate excessive noises by protecting significant gradients and accelerate the convergence of the global model by calculating dynamic aggregation weights for gradients. Experimental results show that DP-FedASGP achieves comparable privacy protection effects to DP-FedAvg and cpSGD (communication-private SGD based on gradient quantization) but outperforms DP-FedSNLC (sparse noise based on clipping losses and privacy budget costs) and FedSMP (sparsified model perturbation). Furthermore, the average global test accuracy of DP-FedASGP across four datasets and three models is about <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.62$</tex-math></inline-formula>%, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4.71$</tex-math></inline-formula>%, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.45$</tex-math></inline-formula>%, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.19$</tex-math></inline-formula>% higher than the above methods, respectively. These improvements indicate that DP-FedASGP is a promising approach for balancing the privacy and accuracy of DP-FL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Computers
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2024.3477971
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Privacy and Accuracy Using Significant Gradient Protection in Federated Learning

Huawei Huang, Xiaoming He, Jie Wu, Benteng Zhang et al.
10 citations
IEEE Transactions on Computers
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
3.47
article

Balancing Privacy and Accuracy Using Significant Gradient Protection in Federated Learning

Huawei Huang, Xiaoming He, Jie Wu, Benteng Zhang, Yingchi Mao
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Previous state-of-the-art studies have demonstrated that adversaries can access sensitive user data by membership inference attacks (MIAs) in Federated Learning (FL). Introducing differential privacy (DP) into the FL framework is an effective way to enhance the privacy of FL. Nevertheless, in differentially private federated learning (DP-FL), local gradients become excessively sparse in certain training rounds. Especially when training with low privacy budgets, there is a risk of introducing excessive noise into clients’ gradients. This issue can lead to a significant degradation in the accuracy of the global model. Thus, how to balance the user's privacy and global model accuracy becomes a challenge in DP-FL. To this end, we propose an approach, known as differential privacy federated aggregation, based on significant gradient protection (DP-FedASGP). DP-FedASGP can mitigate excessive noises by protecting significant gradients and accelerate the convergence of the global model by calculating dynamic aggregation weights for gradients. Experimental results show that DP-FedASGP achieves comparable privacy protection effects to DP-FedAvg and cpSGD (communication-private SGD based on gradient quantization) but outperforms DP-FedSNLC (sparse noise based on clipping losses and privacy budget costs) and FedSMP (sparsified model perturbation). Furthermore, the average global test accuracy of DP-FedASGP across four datasets and three models is about <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.62$</tex-math></inline-formula>%, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4.71$</tex-math></inline-formula>%, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.45$</tex-math></inline-formula>%, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.19$</tex-math></inline-formula>% higher than the above methods, respectively. These improvements indicate that DP-FedASGP is a promising approach for balancing the privacy and accuracy of DP-FL.

IEEE Transactions on ComputersVol. 74(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Hohai University (CN), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Temple University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
3.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.