Translating classical Arabic verse: human translation vs. AI large language models (Gemini and ChatGPT)

Classical Arabic poetry is a sophisticated and complex art form, combining intricate themes with refined stylistic forms. This paper examines the translation of 15 individual Classical Arabic verses by comparing the English renditions provided by a human translator and two prominent large language models (LLMs), namely Google’s Gemini (GEM) and OpenAI’s ChatGPT (GPT). The human and LLMs are evaluated in relation to three variables: thematic clarity, creativity, and prosody by 54 Arab professors in Literature, Linguistics, or Translation who use English as a medium of instruction at their universities and are considered qualified as assessors. The translations are also evaluated by the two LLMs. The findings show that participants’ assessment of human and GPT translations are clearly positive on the three variables, while GEM significantly lags behind in terms of prosody (M 2.83) and even more so in its own assessment (M 1). As for AI technology assessment, GPT is clearly consistent with participants’ evaluation, in contrast to GEM assessment, which is markedly different in terms of prosody and creativity. The study concludes that AI technology emerges as a true competitor with human translators, and their interactive potentials need to be further explored in poetry translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2410998
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating classical Arabic verse: human translation vs. AI large language models (Gemini and ChatGPT)

Mohammed Farghal, Ahmad S. Haider
23 citations
Cogent Social Sciences
Natural Language Processing Techniques
7.99
article

Translating classical Arabic verse: human translation vs. AI large language models (Gemini and ChatGPT)

Mohammed Farghal, Ahmad S. Haider
article en
23 citations

Abstract

Classical Arabic poetry is a sophisticated and complex art form, combining intricate themes with refined stylistic forms. This paper examines the translation of 15 individual Classical Arabic verses by comparing the English renditions provided by a human translator and two prominent large language models (LLMs), namely Google’s Gemini (GEM) and OpenAI’s ChatGPT (GPT). The human and LLMs are evaluated in relation to three variables: thematic clarity, creativity, and prosody by 54 Arab professors in Literature, Linguistics, or Translation who use English as a medium of instruction at their universities and are considered qualified as assessors. The translations are also evaluated by the two LLMs. The findings show that participants’ assessment of human and GPT translations are clearly positive on the three variables, while GEM significantly lags behind in terms of prosody (M 2.83) and even more so in its own assessment (M 1). As for AI technology assessment, GPT is clearly consistent with participants’ evaluation, in contrast to GEM assessment, which is markedly different in terms of prosody and creativity. The study concludes that AI technology emerges as a true competitor with human translators, and their interactive potentials need to be further explored in poetry translation.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 10(1)
Applied Science Private University (JO), Language Science (South Korea) (KR), Middle East University (JO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
7.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.